Wrestling Talk Forums supported
USA Wrestling-Kansas KWCA Wrestling Talk Forums supported & maintained by USA Wrestling-Kansas USAW USA Wrestling-Kansas 
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Tougher Beloit or Newton? #47868 02/20/03 01:54 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 13
The Coach Offline OP
Junior Member
OP Offline
Junior Member
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 13
I know they're both great tournaments but which was tougher this year, Beloit or Newton? I would say Beloit was tougher. What do you guys think? Prant you got your butt kicked at both right? Which offered the worst whoopin'? Just messin' with you no offense!


Speak stickly and carry a big softy
Re: Tougher Beloit or Newton? #47869 02/20/03 02:19 AM
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,408
Prant Garker Offline
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,408
How DARE you.

I think they were pretty close, but Newton was tougher just because there are so many teams, and there were so many studs. While Beloit had Hoxie, Manhappiness, and Clay Center, Newton had The Hat, Clay Center, Ark City, Bishop Carrol, Hutch, among others.

Re: Tougher Beloit or Newton? #47870 02/20/03 03:21 AM
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 224
bigkneepads#2 Offline
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 224
You forget Norton!! How dare you!! My cousin will not be pleased when he hears of this!!


Dolts.


"To the hip hop, the hippity hop, the hip hop dippity dee" (Rapper's Delight, Sugarhill Gang, circa 1983)

Moderated by  Nate Naasz, RedStorm 

Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 191 guests, and 2 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
bvswwrestling, CoachFitzOS, Dluce, Shawn Russell, CorbinPickerill
12302 Registered Users
Forum Statistics
Forums10
Topics35,958
Posts250,395
Members12,302
Most Online709
Nov 21st, 2011
Top Posters(All Time)
usawks1 8,595
smokeycabin 6,248
Aaron Sweazy 5,255
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.2
(Release build 20190702)
PHP: 7.2.34 Page Time: 0.020s Queries: 13 (0.002s) Memory: 0.7528 MB (Peak: 0.8284 MB) Data Comp: Off Server Time: 2024-06-06 01:15:51 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS