I am somewhat confused about how wrestlers are ranked. I don't know or understand as much as I should about this sport, but to rank a wrestler with a record of winning less than half of his matches seems a little out of balance! This is especially true when a wrestler who has a 17 - 6 record with a win this year over the ranked wrestler hasn't been considered in the ranking process. Even more so when the wrestler not considered has wins over the #3-5A wrestler, the #5-5A wrestler, the #5-6A wrestler and the #6-4A wrestler all this season. His only losses in Kansas are to the #1-6A wrestler, the #1-4A wrestler, the #4-6A wrestler and one loss to a wrestler who has been ranked but is not at this time. To my knowledge the ranked wrestler in this reply had not defeated another ranked wrestler until this past week. I believe that more accurate records or research should be involved before deserving young men are left out or not even considered!