Wrestling Talk Forums supported
USA Wrestling-Kansas KWCA Wrestling Talk Forums supported & maintained by USA Wrestling-Kansas USAW USA Wrestling-Kansas 
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 4 1 2 3 4
Re: Johnson County Classic [Re: smokeycabin] #176796 12/16/10 07:31 PM
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 781
B
back in the day Offline OP
Member
OP Offline
Member
B
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 781
Originally Posted By: smokeycabin
I think SMNW and BVW will be in the hunt/mix.


Mill Valley won by 1/2 point last year over GE and both teams have more depth this year. SJA has the twin horses at 145 and 152 and more depth than in the past. I think it will be decided by the backside place winners between these four teams


The older I get the better I was!
Re: Johnson County Classic [Re: grappler pops] #176797 12/16/10 07:33 PM
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 541
L
LancerLou Offline
Member
Offline
Member
L
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 541
I am glad to see some talk about the JOCO Classic. It is one of my favorite tournaments. I like the format with pools on Friday and earning your way onto the bracket on Saturday. There are always several college wrestlers who return to cheer on their high school. A few college coaches manage to fit in both the Tosiba and a visit to the JOCO.


Lou Ann Baker


Re: Johnson County Classic [Re: LancerLou] #176800 12/16/10 07:47 PM
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 66
W
willie424 Offline
Member
Offline
Member
W
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 66
This will be a fun tournament, and will be interesting for the team race with SJA having some new freshman and some solid senior depth. Along with GE, and mill valley ready to take it home

Re: Johnson County Classic [Re: grappler pops] #176801 12/16/10 08:48 PM
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 52
B
BVWJAGS Offline
Member
Offline
Member
B
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 52
I would not expect BVW to contend this year in the JOCO as they have the past couple of years. They are reloading this year and will be very competitive in the upcoming years. This years varsity currently has 3 seniors, 4 juniors, 5 sophomores, and 2 freshman. Incoming freshman class had about 30 strong, athletic kids come out for the team. Their strength in the past has been that although they did not have the very elite level wrestler, they had an abundance of good, solid wrestlers who scored team points on the back side of the bracket. As was mentioned above, the BVSW opening cost them some good experienced wrestlers. Look for them to improve throughout the year.

Re: Johnson County Classic [Re: BVWJAGS] #176827 12/17/10 01:16 PM
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 781
B
back in the day Offline OP
Member
OP Offline
Member
B
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 781
When will the seeds be released?


The older I get the better I was!
Re: Johnson County Classic [Re: back in the day] #176832 12/17/10 02:00 PM
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 10,433
C
Chief Renegade Offline
Member
Offline
Member
C
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 10,433
All I know is:

152:
1. Cokeley - SJA
2. Middleton - ONW
3. Woofter - SME


Eric Johnson


Acts 4:12


Re: Johnson County Classic [Re: grappler pops] #176836 12/17/10 02:22 PM
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 25
MVHS2011 Offline
Junior Member
Offline
Junior Member
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 25
Beck will not be wrestling this weekend. Will be back after the break.

Re: Johnson County Classic [Re: MVHS2011] #176837 12/17/10 02:32 PM
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 781
B
back in the day Offline OP
Member
OP Offline
Member
B
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 781
Beck - Mason - Pacheco will have many more opportunities to wrestle this season. Hope Leo gets some good rest.


The older I get the better I was!
Re: Johnson County Classic [Re: back in the day] #176843 12/17/10 04:14 PM
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 10,433
C
Chief Renegade Offline
Member
Offline
Member
C
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 10,433
All these could change. These are PRE Weigh-in!

103:
1. Henes - STA
2. Cokeley - SJA
3. Coker - SMW
4. B. Gordan SMNW

112:
1. Paxton - BVW
2. Mancuso - SJA
3. Jorns - SME
4. Price - GE

119:
1. Nemer - SH
2. Parise - BVW
3. Dickman - MV
4. Ikenberry - STA

125:
1. Whitmore - SMNW
2. Humphrey - SMS
3. Grove - BV
4. Litvak - GE

130:
1. Stokes - GE
2. Williams - STA
3. McCulley - BVNW
4. Bjorgo - BVSW

135:
1. Tanenbaum - BVN
2. Bauerly - OS
3. Williams - GE
4. Vielhauer - SJA

140:
1. Moeder - SJA
2. Murrison - ONW
3. Bjorgo - BVSW
4. Kerns - BVW

145:
1. Simmons - BVN
2. Collins - OE
3. Ellison - MVV
4. Keehn - GE

152:
1. Cokeley - SJA
2. Middleton - ONW
3. Woofter - SME
4. Poston - BVSW

160:
1. Haug - SJA
2. VanHolland - MV
3. Hill - SME
4. Long - GE

171:
1. Lyons - BVNW
2. Pollom - SJA
3. Hill - SME
4. Vukas - DS

189:
1. Barnhart - SMN
2. Parr - DS
3. Stockton - GE
4. Galvin - SMNW

215:
1. Mason - STA
2. Pacheco - GE
3. Kettler - SH
4. Mitchell - BVNW

285:
1. Walberg - STA
2. Callahan - MV
3. Elliott - BVNW
4. Jensen - SMS

ALL-CLASS RANKED

Last edited by Chief Renegade; 12/17/10 07:10 PM.

Eric Johnson


Acts 4:12


Re: Johnson County Classic [Re: Chief Renegade] #176844 12/17/10 06:10 PM
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 781
B
back in the day Offline OP
Member
OP Offline
Member
B
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 781
135:
1. 135:
1. Tanenbaum - BVN
2. Bauerly - OS
3. Williams - GE
4. Vielhauer - SJA

140:
1. Moeder - SJA
2. Murrison - ONW
3. Bjorgo - BVSW
4. Kerns - BVW

So Moeder goes down to 140 and Tanenbaum to 135
That would have been a good match.


The older I get the better I was!
Re: Johnson County Classic [Re: Chief Renegade] #176847 12/17/10 06:43 PM
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 411
Ed Wilson Offline
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 411
Originally Posted By: Chief Renegade

171:
1. Lyons - BVNW
2. Pollom - SJA
3. Hill - SME
4. Vukas - DS

ALL-CLASS RANKED


Did you see that Eckenbacherswartzendruber?

Lawrence Elite Wrestling Club
Re: Johnson County Classic [Re: Ed Wilson] #176849 12/17/10 07:00 PM
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 781
B
back in the day Offline OP
Member
OP Offline
Member
B
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 781
Yep looks like Pollom is in Chiefs all class at No 9


The older I get the better I was!
Re: Johnson County Classic [Re: back in the day] #176866 12/18/10 04:34 AM
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 781
B
back in the day Offline OP
Member
OP Offline
Member
B
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 781
Unofficial team standings

SJA
STA
Spring Hill
GE


The older I get the better I was!
Re: Johnson County Classic [Re: back in the day] #176890 12/19/10 01:40 AM
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 781
B
back in the day Offline OP
Member
OP Offline
Member
B
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 781
Team places

ST James 232
Gardner Edgerton 213
sta 209
Spring Hill ?

Fun tournament to watch with friends new and old

Here are some questions:


What did the official say to Mr Cokeley during the 103lb final match? I bet all of the Cokeley haters will want to know.


How about those freshmen?

Two championships and two Seconds tonight. Lots of good battles to come in the future!

Cokeley - SJA-103 1st
Henes - STA 103 2nd
Dickman - MV 119 1st
Williams GE 135. 2nd


The elephant in the room question:

Why did Tanenbaum go down to 135?
Sure he won - but it was a lot closer with Williams being a quick study.

Moeder won easily at 140.

Thanks to Blue Valley for a great two days!


The older I get the better I was!
Re: Johnson County Classic [Re: back in the day] #176891 12/19/10 02:04 AM
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 77
hit it hard! Offline
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 77
The elephant in the room question:

Why did Tanenbaum go down to 135?

Answer: Because he can.











[/quote]

Re: Johnson County Classic [Re: hit it hard!] #176893 12/19/10 02:41 AM
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 44
G
grappler pops Offline
Member
Offline
Member
G
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 44
I know that with pool rounds plus brackets sometimes scoring can get a bit confusing.
But, can someone explain this to me:
103 Cokeley Champ
2 pins in pool wrestling, 2 md and dec in finals = 33 points
112 Paxton Champ
3 pins in pool wrestling, 2 pins and dec in finals = 25 points

Am I reading something wrong?


Terry Paxton
Re: Johnson County Classic [Re: grappler pops] #176896 12/19/10 04:00 AM
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 22
F
fragged91 Offline
Junior Member
Offline
Junior Member
F
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 22
According to the KWCA website, Henes (STA) beat Cokely (St James) 5-2 in the championship match. Is that wrong?

Re: Johnson County Classic [Re: fragged91] #176897 12/19/10 04:11 AM
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 44
G
grappler pops Offline
Member
Offline
Member
G
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 44
Yes, the website is wrong, Cokeley wrestled a great match and won.


Terry Paxton
Re: Johnson County Classic [Re: grappler pops] #176903 12/19/10 05:14 AM
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 273
Q
Quagmire Offline
Member
Offline
Member
Q
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 273
It was also wrong on the 189 results. Parr wbf over Barnhart.

Re: Johnson County Classic [Re: grappler pops] #176905 12/19/10 05:41 AM
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 180
Bender Offline
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 180
Originally Posted By: grappler pops
I know that with pool rounds plus brackets sometimes scoring can get a bit confusing.
But, can someone explain this to me:
103 Cokeley Champ
2 pins in pool wrestling, 2 md and dec in finals = 33 points
112 Paxton Champ
3 pins in pool wrestling, 2 pins and dec in finals = 25 points

Am I reading something wrong?



There appears to be many mistakes on the results on the kwca results. I also would like to know where all of the points came from this year. There are three teams with 200 points when no team broke 160 in the previous year.

Last edited by Bender; 12/19/10 05:41 AM.

Bite my shiny metal @$$
Page 2 of 4 1 2 3 4

Moderated by  Nate Naasz, RedStorm 

Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 112 guests, and 2 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
CorbinPickerill, ptv, Dane Edwards, Mikemacias, tcox
12298 Registered Users
Forum Statistics
Forums10
Topics35,943
Posts250,375
Members12,298
Most Online709
Nov 21st, 2011
Top Posters(All Time)
usawks1 8,595
smokeycabin 6,248
Aaron Sweazy 5,255
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.2
(Release build 20190702)
PHP: 7.2.34 Page Time: 0.023s Queries: 15 (0.006s) Memory: 0.8570 MB (Peak: 1.1252 MB) Data Comp: Off Server Time: 2024-05-11 23:30:43 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS