Wrestling Talk Forums supported
USA Wrestling-Kansas KWCA Wrestling Talk Forums supported & maintained by USA Wrestling-Kansas USAW USA Wrestling-Kansas 
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Gardner vs Blue Valley North results #194211 12/02/11 04:19 AM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 105
bigwillyxl Offline OP
Member
OP Offline
Member
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 105
Gardner 52 Blue Valley North 22

106 Burger GE W 17-8 vs Bergmeir BVN
113 Zack BVN WBF vs Hills GE
120 Merenda BVN WBF vs Fitzpartick GE
126 Widrig BVN W 13-0 vs Norton GE
132 Ewbank W 9-5 vs Long BVN
138 Berends GE WBF vs Jones BVN
145 Williams GE WBF vs McLeod BVN
152 E. Heniss GE WBF vs Ruby BVN
160 Keehn GE WBF vs Rutter BVN
170 Pesek GE W 16-2 vs Carry BVN
182 Eckelberry GE W For. vs OPEN BVN
195 Kimmaneau BVN WBF vs Ahlsen GE
220 Stockton GE WBF vs Carter BVN
285 Willard GE W For. vs OPEN BVN


Last edited by bigwillyxl; 12/02/11 04:22 AM.
Re: Gardner vs Blue Valley North results [Re: bigwillyxl] #194216 12/02/11 11:04 AM
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 6,248
S
smokeycabin Offline
Member
Offline
Member
S
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 6,248
Open at 182 and HWT

Re: Gardner vs Blue Valley North results [Re: smokeycabin] #194235 12/02/11 01:46 PM
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 781
B
back in the day Offline
Member
Offline
Member
B
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 781
I guess Smokey is the open weight monitor.

GE had a full line up and more to share.


The older I get the better I was!
Re: Gardner vs Blue Valley North results [Re: back in the day] #194248 12/02/11 03:32 PM
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 5
S
sideover Offline
Junior Member
Offline
Junior Member
S
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 5
GE 170 was open due to injury if I heard correctly.
I think Pesek(182) vs. Curry(170) was a catch weight match.
Final score was 10-3 if I remember correctly.
FYI.

Last edited by sideover; 12/02/11 03:34 PM.
Re: Gardner vs Blue Valley North results [Re: sideover] #194249 12/02/11 03:37 PM
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 781
B
back in the day Offline
Member
Offline
Member
B
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 781
No Pesek was 170. Ge was not open.

Three varsity wrestlers did not compete last night: Some folk moved up weights to accomodate and some younger guys got a win for Blazers. All will be in line up on Saturday.


The older I get the better I was!
Re: Gardner vs Blue Valley North results [Re: back in the day] #194250 12/02/11 03:39 PM
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 5
S
sideover Offline
Junior Member
Offline
Junior Member
S
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 5
OK. I thought I heard Pesek was 182 and they asked Curry to wrestle up.
My bad.Thanks for the clarification.

So Pesek is the GE 170 this year?

Last edited by sideover; 12/02/11 03:54 PM.
Re: Gardner vs Blue Valley North results [Re: smokeycabin] #194275 12/03/11 12:52 AM
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,555
Beeson Offline
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,555
Originally Posted By: smokeycabin
Open at 182 and HWT
I guess the Heavier weights that we added weren't really needed. At least the lighter weights were full smile


Unnecessary Roughness is Necessary
Re: Gardner vs Blue Valley North results [Re: Beeson] #194279 12/03/11 02:17 AM
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 984
X
XGHSWC Offline
Member
Offline
Member
X
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 984
Originally Posted By: Beeson
Originally Posted By: smokeycabin
Open at 182 and HWT
I guess the Heavier weights that we added weren't really needed. At least the lighter weights were full smile


Yeah, but we knew that before the season even started, didn't we? smile


Moderated by  Nate Naasz, RedStorm 

Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 125 guests, and 1 spider.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
CorbinPickerill, ptv, Dane Edwards, Mikemacias, tcox
12298 Registered Users
Forum Statistics
Forums10
Topics35,924
Posts250,329
Members12,298
Most Online709
Nov 21st, 2011
Top Posters(All Time)
usawks1 8,595
smokeycabin 6,248
Aaron Sweazy 5,254
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.2
(Release build 20190702)
PHP: 7.2.34 Page Time: 0.019s Queries: 15 (0.003s) Memory: 0.7786 MB (Peak: 0.9060 MB) Data Comp: Off Server Time: 2024-04-16 15:00:35 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS