Wrestling Talk Forums supported
USA Wrestling-Kansas KWCA Wrestling Talk Forums supported & maintained by USA Wrestling-Kansas USAW USA Wrestling-Kansas 
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 6 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6
Re: No Satelite Weigh Ins for Subs and District [Re: JACD_Moison] #202974 03/09/12 04:23 AM
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 89
D
DannyB Offline
Member
Offline
Member
D
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 89
I would rather be watching this sport as well, Jimmy. Credit?? That small percent of parents aren't calling the Chiefs or going to their games. Maybe we as coaches should say during signups in Nov. Parents it cost $X for 20 tourny's plus qualifing tournys'. If you can't afford it go buy a X Box its $300.00 one time fee, and if you have extra money you can go live.


Make yourself better for the NEXT level
Re: No Satelite Weigh Ins for Subs and District [Re: DannyB] #202976 03/09/12 04:59 AM
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 758
nix Offline
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 758
wow read every post on this took awhile lol, might be the longest thread of 2012 i think all of you have some good points the only point i can't see is who in there right mind would want to watch the chiefs, i could see watching the broncos but the chiefs.


"Saints should always be judged guilty until they are proved innocent"

jeff nix
620-214-0433
Re: No Satelite Weigh Ins for Subs and District [Re: nix] #202977 03/09/12 05:12 AM
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 89
D
DannyB Offline
Member
Offline
Member
D
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 89
come on Jeff Chiefs will pick up Peyton Manning since he is older and how can you go with Broncos without Shannahan and Elway?


Make yourself better for the NEXT level
Re: No Satelite Weigh Ins for Subs and District [Re: DannyB] #202981 03/09/12 05:29 AM
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 758
nix Offline
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 758
like i told bockman, broncos will give you chiefs tebow then u need to sign dick vermil back as coach, so when the chiefs are loseing one can be praying to god while the other is crying.


"Saints should always be judged guilty until they are proved innocent"

jeff nix
620-214-0433
Re: No Satelite Weigh Ins for Subs and District [Re: Matt Treaster] #202984 03/09/12 05:38 AM
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 89
D
DannyB Offline
Member
Offline
Member
D
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 89
Originally Posted By: Matt Treaster
Members:

Our board has made a concerted effort to make our sub-district and district tournaments uniform. I realize it is impossible to make ever last detail the same, but we must do what we can to make the major items consistent. Weigh-ins (and the requisite hair/skin/nail checks) are one of those major items. No satelite weigh-ins will be allowed for sub-district, district, or state tournaments.

Matt Treaster
Executive Director
Kansas Kids Wrestling

Yet there are 2 subs that are weighing from 5:30-8:00 the other six subs are weighing in from 6-8 (according to their event flyers), a "major item" said Matt Treaster! I hope they are doing this due to the miles they have to travel. They are getting and extra 30 mins to cut weight or make weight, however you want to look at it. Also 2 subs using the Split session format and 6 going with the standard format. Don't see the uniformaty. Not sure how, but if the by-laws don't say no satellite weigh ins and the Governing board doesn't keep it uniform (like they claim) why we can't follow the host tourny directors instructions (as per By-laws) and have a satellite with paid HS officials with their signature on skin/nail/hair and weight certification?


Make yourself better for the NEXT level
Re: No Satelite Weigh Ins for Subs and District [Re: nix] #202985 03/09/12 05:40 AM
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 89
D
DannyB Offline
Member
Offline
Member
D
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 89
to funny-- it would be like a talk forum then


Make yourself better for the NEXT level
Re: No Satelite Weigh Ins for Subs and District [Re: DannyB] #203040 03/09/12 02:35 PM
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 3,066
D
doug747 Offline
Member
Offline
Member
D
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 3,066
Bottom line, I am confident that a district could have a satellite weigh in, then spend money gettting an injunction to have a judge tell us that the kids who were declared ineligible, can still wrestle.........But who wants to spend money on attorneys? Sounds like we need to just let it rest for this year's series. Someone needs to make a proposal to be voted on at the state body meeting, so that we can do satellite weighins next year.

Re: No Satelite Weigh Ins for Subs and District [Re: doug747] #203051 03/09/12 03:07 PM
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 408
in it to win it Offline
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 408
#1. Research needs to be done on the # state series that allow "satellite weigh-ins". The variables are substantial in the State series. Many already
have been described in this column. An informed decision making process brought forth as a proposal---however, this may be opening Pandora's box inasmuch as to does satellite weigh-in stop at subs, district or state? Easily arguable if its a time, $$ issue not so much if its an integrity issue. Would it truly come down to we'd have 'more participants' in subs? Doubtful.

< 2 years ago a university coach (CA) was fired for weight fixing his wrestlers.


In it to win it.
Re: No Satelite Weigh Ins for Subs and District [Re: in it to win it] #203061 03/09/12 03:35 PM
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 3,066
D
doug747 Offline
Member
Offline
Member
D
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 3,066
Originally Posted By: in it to win it
#1. Research needs to be done on the # state series that allow "satellite weigh-ins". The variables are substantial in the State series. Many already
have been described in this column. An informed decision making process brought forth as a proposal---however, this may be opening Pandora's box inasmuch as to does satellite weigh-in stop at subs, district or state? Easily arguable if its a time, $$ issue not so much if its an integrity issue. Would it truly come down to we'd have 'more participants' in subs? Doubtful.

< 2 years ago a university coach (CA) was fired for weight fixing his wrestlers.


***As well he should have been............And if someone would violate the trust that the wrestling community puts in him/her at a weigh in, they should be banned from any participation in our sport.*********

Page 6 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6

Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 135 guests, and 1 spider.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
CorbinPickerill, ptv, Dane Edwards, Mikemacias, tcox
12298 Registered Users
Forum Statistics
Forums10
Topics35,938
Posts250,369
Members12,298
Most Online709
Nov 21st, 2011
Top Posters(All Time)
usawks1 8,595
smokeycabin 6,248
Aaron Sweazy 5,254
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.2
(Release build 20190702)
PHP: 7.2.34 Page Time: 0.024s Queries: 16 (0.005s) Memory: 0.7934 MB (Peak: 0.9541 MB) Data Comp: Off Server Time: 2024-05-05 16:23:09 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS