Wrestling Talk Forums supported
USA Wrestling-Kansas KWCA Wrestling Talk Forums supported & maintained by USA Wrestling-Kansas USAW USA Wrestling-Kansas 
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3
Bias #227074 03/04/14 11:13 PM
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 10,431
C
Chief Renegade Offline OP
Member
OP Offline
Member
C
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 10,431
Does anyone still think I had a St. James bias? It looks like I underestimated them!

All those negative comments about me unrightfully ranking them too high and then they win by 63 points and I can hear birds chirping. Isn't that always like it is? Oh well... It's lonely being a ranker. lol.


Eric Johnson


Acts 4:12


Re: Bias [Re: Chief Renegade] #227076 03/04/14 11:21 PM
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 337
S
Spexy Offline
Member
Offline
Member
S
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 337
IMOP, your predictions were spot on.
You made a comment early in the season of, "don't wake a sleeping giant", (Goddard). Weighing the age and talent, SJA, was the team to beat.
Bias, no, but next year, with fingers crossed, the "giant" might be awakening. Lol.

Re: Bias [Re: Chief Renegade] #227082 03/05/14 12:24 AM
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 40
B
BDRan Offline
Member
Offline
Member
B
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 40
Originally Posted By: Chief Renegade
Does anyone still think I had a St. James bias? It looks like I underestimated them!

All those negative comments about me unrightfully ranking them too high and then they win by 63 points and I can hear birds chirping. Isn't that always like it is? Oh well... It's lonely being a ranker. lol.



It's lonely at the top Chief. Keep doin what you're doin, because I don't see anybody stepping up trying to do a better job.


Isaiah 6:8
Re: Bias [Re: BDRan] #227083 03/05/14 12:28 AM
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 169
R
Rford Offline
Member
Offline
Member
R
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 169
Nothing wrong with being biased....the question is can you back it up? Obviously you can.

Re: Bias [Re: Rford] #227085 03/05/14 12:38 AM
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,555
Beeson Offline
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,555
I still think that you are biased. The problem is there is nothing wrong with being biased. Just be honest enough with yourself to admit it.


Unnecessary Roughness is Necessary
Re: Bias [Re: Beeson] #227087 03/05/14 12:44 AM
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 10,431
C
Chief Renegade Offline OP
Member
OP Offline
Member
C
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 10,431
Lol. Look up bias. It means favortism or unfairness. I just called it as it was and evidently not loud enough.


Eric Johnson


Acts 4:12


Re: Bias [Re: Chief Renegade] #227093 03/05/14 01:01 AM
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,555
Beeson Offline
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,555
I think you are very objective and for the most part do a great job. I also think that you root for St. James and all things being even the St. James kid would get the nod.

People can be objective and biased at the same time. I am. I root for the Bulldogs and want them to do well. I also see the point of view against the Bulldogs when a call goes against them. I can make a fair call even if it is against the Bulldogs. That is Objective and Biased. Absolutely nothing wrong with it. Just be able to admit it.


Unnecessary Roughness is Necessary
Re: Bias [Re: Beeson] #227094 03/05/14 01:03 AM
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 10,431
C
Chief Renegade Offline OP
Member
OP Offline
Member
C
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 10,431
When I ranked Goddard #1 for two years, they called me Wichita biased. Which is it?


Eric Johnson


Acts 4:12


Re: Bias [Re: Chief Renegade] #227095 03/05/14 01:04 AM
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,555
Beeson Offline
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,555
Are we really arguing in text and on the forum. confused Lets pick just one place to debate. wink


Unnecessary Roughness is Necessary
Re: Bias [Re: Beeson] #227096 03/05/14 01:05 AM
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,555
Beeson Offline
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,555
As I texted, it is easy to pick the best wrestlers or team in the state. It is when you get to the bottom of the better wrestlers that it starts to show. Picking the favorite is easy.


Unnecessary Roughness is Necessary
Re: Bias [Re: Beeson] #227100 03/05/14 01:12 AM
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 10,431
C
Chief Renegade Offline OP
Member
OP Offline
Member
C
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 10,431
Originally Posted By: Beeson
As I texted, it is easy to pick the best wrestlers or team in the state. It is when you get to the bottom of the better wrestlers that it starts to show. Picking the favorite is easy.


Never any examples. Just empty talk.


Eric Johnson


Acts 4:12


Re: Bias [Re: Beeson] #227104 03/05/14 01:18 AM
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 337
S
Spexy Offline
Member
Offline
Member
S
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 337
Not always, "picking the favorite, is easy" Chad you picked KMC, to be the team to beat. You lost that, prediction. Chief, had SJA. Goddard #2. KMC #3. Don't see your reasoning on "Bias"? He calls it like he sees it. Good job Chief.

Re: Bias [Re: Chief Renegade] #227106 03/05/14 01:19 AM
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,555
Beeson Offline
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,555
I'll get you some examples. If it is just empty talk, why is it eating at you to the point you made a topic just for this subject. You must feel there is some merit to it, or it wouldn't bother you.


Unnecessary Roughness is Necessary
Re: Bias [Re: Beeson] #227108 03/05/14 01:20 AM
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 10,431
C
Chief Renegade Offline OP
Member
OP Offline
Member
C
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 10,431
Originally Posted By: Beeson
I'll get you some examples. If it is just empty talk, why is it eating at you to the point you made a topic just for this subject. You must feel there is some merit to it, or it wouldn't bother you.


The truth will set you free Chad. smile


Eric Johnson


Acts 4:12


Re: Bias [Re: Spexy] #227109 03/05/14 01:20 AM
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,555
Beeson Offline
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,555
Originally Posted By: Spexy
Not always, "picking the favorite, is easy" Chad you picked KMC, to be the team to beat. You lost that, prediction. Chief, had SJA. Goddard #2. KMC #3. Don't see your reasoning on "Bias"? He calls it like he sees it. Good job Chief.


Well I had Goddard before Chief moved them to #2. Why don't you check and see how close he was at the beginning of the year. SJA still #1, that was the easy one. And I picked KMC and Goddard in the middle of the season to bring some excitement to the forums. It did help.

Last edited by Beeson; 03/05/14 01:21 AM.

Unnecessary Roughness is Necessary
Re: Bias [Re: Beeson] #227113 03/05/14 01:32 AM
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,555
Beeson Offline
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,555
First Rankings: #1 SJA #2 STA #3 Ark City KMC and Goddard were not even in the rankings. The best was the easiest, took forever for KMC and Goddard to crack into the rankings.


Unnecessary Roughness is Necessary
Re: Bias [Re: Beeson] #227121 03/05/14 01:55 AM
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 337
S
Spexy Offline
Member
Offline
Member
S
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 337
Ok, true. Took a long time. SJA, KMC. Had multiple seniors. Ark city, and Goddard didn't. As the season progressed don't you feel these 2 young teams made a mark on the future? (Ark City, Goddard). Just don't see "Bias" as a concern.

Re: Bias [Re: Spexy] #227127 03/05/14 02:05 AM
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,555
Beeson Offline
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,555
I agree "Bias" is not a concern. I just would like for it to be admitted. The rankings are pretty close, but they should be. They change every week, sometimes two or three times a week. I appreciate what Chief does as much as the next guy, but they aren't even close to what they were at the beginning of the year.


Unnecessary Roughness is Necessary
Re: Bias [Re: Spexy] #227131 03/05/14 02:09 AM
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 48
B
bradbee Offline
Member
Offline
Member
B
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 48
Let me say congrats Chief and St. James. Turns out that they were the best team this year. I have given Chief quite a bit of grief this year about bias, and unfortunately I went to far and it turned into being critical of his rankings. 90% of the time I feel that you rankings are right on. The thing that makes me call bias actually has less to do with your rankings and more to do with your common theme on most of the threads on the forum.... If it is good for St. Thomas and St. James Chief is for it.... if not he is against it.... When post go up about St. James kids getting 100 wins he is first to say great kid and great job... I just miss not seeing him comment on most of the other kids threads. By the way Chief, I enjoyed the picture of you holding the St. James 1st place trophy this year at state, guess I just missed the picture of you with Ark City the last 2 years....

Re: Bias [Re: bradbee] #227135 03/05/14 02:24 AM
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 90
K
ksuwrestling2 Offline
Member
Offline
Member
K
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 90
I never said because you were biased your picks were wrong. I just think it's biased that you root for them so much. But yes, with all of the talent they "put together" it was inevitable they would win. Congratulations SJA/Blair Academy.


Steve Moser
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3

Moderated by  Nate Naasz, RedStorm 

Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 142 guests, and 0 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
CorbinPickerill, ptv, Dane Edwards, Mikemacias, tcox
12298 Registered Users
Forum Statistics
Forums10
Topics35,934
Posts250,365
Members12,298
Most Online709
Nov 21st, 2011
Top Posters(All Time)
usawks1 8,595
smokeycabin 6,248
Aaron Sweazy 5,254
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.2
(Release build 20190702)
PHP: 7.2.34 Page Time: 0.022s Queries: 16 (0.003s) Memory: 0.8465 MB (Peak: 1.1184 MB) Data Comp: Off Server Time: 2024-04-29 02:00:32 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS