Just playing the Devils advocate here.

Isn't this the exact reason that in kids the Districts were changed...to many good kids in D1 and D2 staying home.

Most can say it was to even out the numbers but everyone know the bottom line was state placers getting beat out in districts.

I have also never whined about 6a and 5a kids that have a horrible losing record winning one match and making to state, or the same division wining one match and in the final to qualify.

I feel the average quality of the 16 qualifiers in 4a/321A are generally better than the 16 5a and 6a (wow this will cut you loose Campus).

I don't mean the placers I mean the bottom 10.

Do I complain that 5a and 6a kids we beat qualify when we are in a tough 16 man bracket.

Not at all, losing backside semis last year 4-6 made us better this year.

Losing is a great motivator.