wow was there ever some tough wt classes this year in the 8 and 10 year old brackets. My kids are in those age categories and looking through the program and watching some of those matches there were some great wrestlers. 8 and under 70 and 10 under 76 were loaded.
Posted By: crossface
Re: tough wt classes - 03/27/05 02:34 AM
You will find that next year will be tough also. Ask the kids in the bracket below your kids or above them and you'll get the same respond. They are all tough, it is the state tournament.
i thought 10 and under 85 lbs. was a tough bracket. there were great matches in every round. congrats to all the placers in this very deep bracket!
Posted By: all4wrestling
Re: tough wt classes - 03/27/05 03:41 AM
12 and under 88 was loaded with abunch of good wrestlers like Josh Hansen from Sunflower and Parker Madl from paola were the two that stood out the most to me.
Posted By: Mike Furches
Re: tough wt classes - 03/27/05 12:37 PM
14 & Under 90 was also an exceptional class.
Posted By: Yo This Is TO
Re: tough wt classes - 03/27/05 02:14 PM
16 and under 120 was tough
Posted By: clover
Re: tough wt classes - 03/28/05 12:10 AM
10u-61 was very a tough weight class. Several state placers from last year there.
Posted By: Scarecrow_103
Re: tough wt classes - 03/28/05 12:16 AM
16 u 130 was pretty tough
I thoguth 12&U 100 lbs. was tough! Way to go to those who placed at that weight!
Posted By: Crash99
Re: tough wt classes - 03/28/05 09:46 PM
8U 61 was pretty tough and loaded with some talented wrestlers. I watched with eagerness at the state tournament because of the 4 that qualified from District 2 (all in my son's bracket at districts) and noticed that both kids that beat my son out at Districts placed at State. Suhr (WWC) and Stalford (Coffeyville) took 1st and 6th respectively. Good work boys saw some great wrestling this weekend!
Posted By: hachmeister
Re: tough wt classes - 03/29/05 03:12 AM
i agree with you crash 8U 61 is tough my little brother wrestles that weight class and there are very good wrestlers in it i just wish we could of won one more to place but just couldnt do it. 8U 58 also has some very good wrestlers
Posted By: golden dad
Re: tough wt classes - 03/29/05 09:18 AM
8 and under 52 lbs should rank right up there
Posted By: marlatts
Re: tough wt classes - 03/29/05 10:21 PM
14 under 100 was a though class. so was 10 under 120 .
Posted By: 2coach
Re: tough wt classes - 03/29/05 11:28 PM
8 and under 52 was really though and it does rank up there was the best