Sub-Numbers

Just looking at numbers of districts and was curious about others thoughts. here they are below. Redistricting?

District 1 8 & Under 128 North 118 South =246
District 2 8 & Under 70 North 101 South =171
District 3 8 & Under 124 East 92 West=116
District 4 8 & Under 103 South 79 North=182

District 1 10 & Under 130 North 119 South=249
District 2 10 & Under 74 North 80 South =154
District 3 10 & Under 99 East 94 West=193
District 4 10 & Under 90 South 72 North=162

District 1 12 & Under 129 North 95 South=224
District 2 12 & Under 81 North 80 South =160
District 3 12 & Under 86 East 91 West=177
District 4 12 & Under 91 South 52 North=143

District 1 14 & under 129 North 104 South=233
District 2 14 & under 90 North 82 South =172
District 3 14 & under 91 East 87 West=178
District 4 14 & under 71 South 56 North=137

District 1 High School 85 North 61 South=146
District 2 High School 45 North 17 South = 62
District 3 High School 61 East 34 West=95
District 4 High School 39 South 39 North=78

In all honesty, I was hoping someone would share their thoughts on this. If someone had the time and inclination to do so, could you look back at the last 5 years and see what the trends are? Is there a need to change?

Well Lane, what are your thoughts on ReDistricting? It would appear you have some/one. I would imagine that they would need some data a few years back to see if this is the correct decision or not. One year does not necessarily necessitate change! UNLESS you are referring to the Oblamer "presidency" and THEN I'd agree change would be needed!!!

From the looks of those numbers I think there is no doubt that redistricting needs done.
D1 - 1098 kids
D2 - 720 kids
D3 - 859 kids
D4 - 702 kids

Opportunity for the state series for the kids are no where near equal in each district.

2013 at a glance looks pretty much the same, except there were more kids in subs in every district last year. Wonder why that is?

D1 - 1118
D2 - 821
D3 - 925
D4 - 740

Opportunity for the state series for the kids last year (2013) was no where near equal in each district.

My belief is this had been looked at before and the powers that be feel there was no change needed. My thinking on this is if things were to be evened out it would make district 4 even larger and travel distance even greater, I also believe if change is to be made an extensive study of the numbers for several years past needs to be used and all districts need represented.

Also, because of population trends, some clubs have had travel so as not to be included in District 1.