Wrestling Talk Forums supported
USA Wrestling-Kansas KWCA Wrestling Talk Forums supported & maintained by USA Wrestling-Kansas USAW USA Wrestling-Kansas 
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Mike Mancuso #53847 11/05/03 08:36 PM
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 43
N
n4cer_jr Offline OP
Member
OP Offline
Member
N
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 43
Will he win it this year

Re: Mike Mancuso #53848 11/05/03 09:41 PM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 55
W
wrestler_21_05 Offline
Member
Offline
Member
W
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 55
Not a chance, he should of never went to the finals last year. Marcus herrera would of beat him by at least 5. I would think him and herrera would be in the same weight class this year.

Re: Mike Mancuso #53849 11/05/03 11:23 PM
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 51
T
tadcock Offline
Member
Offline
Member
T
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 51
well he must be half way descent considering he won 2 national titles after high school state

Re: Mike Mancuso #53850 11/06/03 01:21 AM
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,372
rocknraider Offline
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,372
national titles? which national tournaments r they? fargo?


With the power of Ra!
Re: Mike Mancuso #53851 11/06/03 01:52 AM
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 51
T
tadcock Offline
Member
Offline
Member
T
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 51
u.s.a.w. & a.a.u. folkstyle nationals last april.

Re: Mike Mancuso #53852 11/06/03 01:54 AM
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 51
T
tadcock Offline
Member
Offline
Member
T
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 51
u.s.a.w. & a.a.u. folkstyle nationals last april.

Re: Mike Mancuso #53853 11/07/03 01:00 AM
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 72
bo cephus Offline
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 72
uhh i believe it was at 119 where he won those and isnt that lighter than what he was in highschool.

i guess it just depends what wieght he is at

Re: Mike Mancuso #53854 11/07/03 02:04 AM
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,408
Prant Garker Offline
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,408
I disagree with all of you who think Mancuso's run may have been a fluke. He may have had a good draw, and he did get destroyed in the finals, but who wouldn't have been destroyed by McCormick?

What I saw last year was Mancuso wrestling like a ma-ohny ma-ohny ma-ohn at the state tournament. As my close personal friend Dickie V (Dick Vitale) says, maybe our friend Mr. Mancuso is a P-T-Per (prime time player). So the dude had the cojones to step up and wrestle manly at state...don't be mad at him for it.

Re: Mike Mancuso #53855 11/08/03 05:23 AM
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 43
N
n4cer_jr Offline OP
Member
OP Offline
Member
N
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 43
you also have to remember that he only wreslted have a season due to aligablity, so hell ya he did good for only wrestling half a season

Re: Mike Mancuso #53856 11/08/03 06:34 AM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 55
W
wrestler_21_05 Offline
Member
Offline
Member
W
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 55
I can see you might be sitting on the sideline with the way you spell.

Re: Mike Mancuso #53857 11/08/03 10:30 AM
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 72
bo cephus Offline
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 72
I can see Mr. Mancuso has had his moment of glory on this thread… I think he is an outstanding wrestler and all of you that have danced under the big lights in the coliseum. But to say “will he win it this year” He better stay small because the fatties will be shrinking bodies from a summer of eating HoHo’s… nothing like dropping 25lbs. to become a lean mean “buff” wrestling machine. Let the big dogs out of their cages.

Re: Mike Mancuso #53858 11/08/03 09:27 PM
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,372
rocknraider Offline
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,372
if he stays at 125 then he has a shot at winning state. Going up though will only hurt him.


With the power of Ra!
Re: Mike Mancuso #53859 11/12/03 01:18 AM
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 8
garytheretard Offline
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 8
david sielert didnt lose to tyler all that bad. sielert also nearly teched mancuso at emporia duals aswell.....if he made 119 at nat. why didnt he do it during high school. tougher or easier weight between 119 and 125?

Re: Mike Mancuso #53860 11/12/03 06:44 AM
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,372
rocknraider Offline
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,372
Sielert
119-Didnt go 119 because he didnt want to cut that much. he wouldnt have cut that much in the first place for 119, but it still wouldve sucked. flashbacks from him cutting hard for 103 probably swayed him away from that. From what i understand, he was good enough and ranked that like 5th, but the weight cutting hurt his chances of placing. Also at nationals he didnt place...was one away from all-american.

125-He wanted to win a state championship more than anything and he got pinned in a close match against mccormick during the first third of the season. He knew that he couldnt beat tyler, not an opinion, just a fact.

130- Very logical weight for him. Eat as much as he wants, dont cut much at all, stay strong and 130 wasnt that strong in the first place. He knew that he had a decent shot at the title. He took the gamble and it paid off. By the way,i saw the state semi's match where he won in overtime against BJ Essex...great match. Heck, he even made the metro classic dual at 130....none of that wouldve happened if he had gone 119 or 130.


With the power of Ra!
Re: Mike Mancuso #53861 11/12/03 08:35 PM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 55
W
wrestler_21_05 Offline
Member
Offline
Member
W
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 55
I believe marcus herrera beat sielert at the emporia quad by maybe 4 or 5? But he would of had to get through him to get to mccormick anyway at 125.


Moderated by  Nate Naasz, RedStorm 

Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 255 guests, and 3 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
bvswwrestling, CoachFitzOS, Dluce, Shawn Russell, CorbinPickerill
12302 Registered Users
Forum Statistics
Forums10
Topics35,964
Posts250,402
Members12,302
Most Online709
Nov 21st, 2011
Top Posters(All Time)
usawks1 8,595
smokeycabin 6,248
Aaron Sweazy 5,255
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.2
(Release build 20190702)
PHP: 7.2.34 Page Time: 0.024s Queries: 13 (0.003s) Memory: 0.8069 MB (Peak: 1.0051 MB) Data Comp: Off Server Time: 2024-06-09 15:47:07 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS