|
NORTON REGIONAL STATISTICS
#59023
02/29/04 09:53 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 41
The Boss
OP
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 41 |
The top five teams and eight of the top ten were from the Norton Regional.
The percentage of State medals won by wrestlers from the Norton Regional is as follows:
First/Second = 18 of 28 65% Third/Fourth = 15 of 28 53% Fifth/Sixth = 11 of 28 39%
To determine the relative strength of each of the four 321A regionals, the following system was used: a regionals' first place medalist was awarded six points, second received five and so on through sixth which was one point.
Norton Regional: 168 points 1st =10; 2nd =8; 3rd =5; 4th = 10; 5th=7;6th=4
Hoistington Regional: 49 pts 1st=0; 2nd=4; 3rd=4; rth=1; 5th=3; 6th=1
Easton Regional: 49 1st=1; 2nd=2; 3rd=4; 4th=2; 5th=4; 6th=3
Hesston Regional: 28 1st=3; 2nd=0; 3rd=1; 4th=1; 5th=0; 6th=3
# of Medalists by regional: Norton = 44 Easton = 16 Hoisington = 16 Hesston =8
Regional Placers by weight class:
103 Norton 3 Hesston 2 Hoistington 1 Easton 0
112 Norton 3 Easton 2 Hosinton 1 Hesston 0
119 Norton 3 Hoistington 2 Easton 1 Hesston 0
125 Norton 3 Hesston 3 Hoistington 0 Easton 0
130 Norton 3 Hoistington 2 Hesston 1 Easton 0
135 Norton 2 Easton 2 Hoisington 1 Easton 1
140 Norton 4 Easton 2 Hoisington 0 Hesston 0
145 Norton 4 Easton 2 Easton 1 Hoisington 0
152 Norton 4 Hesston 1 Easton 1 Hoisington 0
160 Norton 3 Hoisington 2 Hesstion 1 Easton 0
171 Norton 4 Hoisington 1 Easton 1 Heston 0
189 Norton 3 Hoisington 1 Hesston 1 Easton 1
215 Norton 2 Easton 2 Hesston 1 Hesston 1
275 Norton 3 Easton 2 Hoisington 1 Hesston 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
Re: NORTON REGIONAL STATISTICS
#59024
03/01/04 02:03 AM
|
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 357
Les Brown
Member
|
Member
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 357 |
Let's put it another way.
Each regional sent 56 to state, correct?
The Pleasant Ridge Regional medaled 16, as did the Hoisington Regional. Hesston Regional medaled 8.
Only 12 kids from the Norton regional DID NOT medal!
This is not intended to be a slight to the other regionals - just an observation of how incredible the folks from the Norton regional did.
|
|
|
Re: NORTON REGIONAL STATISTICS
#59025
03/01/04 02:18 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 41
The Boss
OP
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 41 |
Found another mistake: (Thanks Courtney Nightengale) in the breakdown of regional medalsits by weight--at 125--should be three placers from the Norton Regional and three placers from the HOISINGTON Regional--not the Hesston Regional.
The medal count FOR each regional is correct however,--my fingers typed Hesston while my mind was saying Hoisington. I
|
|
|
|
1 registered members (Chase),
188
guests, and 3
spiders. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums10
Topics36,086
Posts250,712
Members12,302
|
Most Online1,305 Mar 13th, 2025
|
|
|
|
|