Wrestling Talk Forums supported
USA Wrestling-Kansas KWCA Wrestling Talk Forums supported & maintained by USA Wrestling-Kansas USAW USA Wrestling-Kansas 
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
losing weight #75647 01/25/05 11:00 PM
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 45
LHSwrestler56 Offline OP
Member
OP Offline
Member
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 45
Does anybody know why standing on your head and then weighing makes u weigh about 2 or 3 tenths? I have done it many times to make weight, and i never knew why is works. anybody know?


Oh well, **** happens and life goes on
Re: losing weight #75648 01/25/05 11:46 PM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 20
M
Mitch103 Offline
Member
Offline
Member
M
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 20
Wow I dont think i have ever tried that one.


Mitch103
Re: losing weight #75649 01/25/05 11:54 PM
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 45
LHSwrestler56 Offline OP
Member
OP Offline
Member
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 45
lol sry i meant to say weigh 2 or 3 tenths lighter.


Oh well, **** happens and life goes on
Re: losing weight #75650 01/26/05 12:00 AM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 33
sed jicard Offline
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 33
i never knew about that one. mabye i should try it somtime.

thanks


live2pin
Re: losing weight #75651 01/26/05 02:20 AM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2
S
SClangII Offline
Member
Offline
Member
S
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2
A simple phenomena explains it all.

An inaccurate scale.

Re: losing weight #75652 01/26/05 03:24 AM
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 126
Brettimus Offline
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 126
exactly. i stood on my head in 8th grade, last tourney at JC and i lost 0/10's of a pound, i was on my head until my feet weren't blue, but sickly white.

Re: losing weight #75653 01/26/05 02:18 PM
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 84
321a_140 Offline
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 84
It doesn't work on a digital scale, only on an old style scale. I would guess the blood moving back to your lower extremities causes your center of gravity to move for a short time, causing the scale to move. Just making a guess though.


Do something...act stupid.
Re: losing weight #75654 01/26/05 02:35 PM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2
Z
Zach140 Offline
Member
Offline
Member
Z
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2
i would have to agree that the blood would migrate toward you head and thus making your center of gravity move in turn lowering your weight by a small amount

Re: losing weight #75655 01/26/05 03:14 PM
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 696
Dingbat Offline
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 696
Are you guys serious? This is the most retarded notion I have ever heard of. Boo, high school science/physics teachers.


Congrats, Aquinas!
Great job, Hat Town!
Salyer Rules!
Re: losing weight #75656 01/26/05 03:31 PM
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 551
J
Jim Gaither Offline
Member
Offline
Member
J
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 551
You might want to look into an equation that states: force (your weight) = mass (your body) x acceleration (earth's gravity)

It's a simple little property that Sir Isaac Newton came across. Unless your mass or earth's gravity changes, your weight will not change. What you experienced was due to some other factor besides standing on your head.

Re: losing weight #75657 01/26/05 06:49 PM
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 984
X
XGHSWC Offline
Member
Offline
Member
X
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 984
"Technically", Scientifically, 321a_140 and Zach140 are correct. Good thought on the Newton thing which is correct concerning weight, but do not forget the basic properties of gravity. The force of gravity is affected by two things, mass and distance. What this means is that more massive objects exert more force (pull) on each other. What it also means is that the closer objects are to each other, the more force (pull) they exert on each other. That is why you accelerate when you fall from a plane. Remember, Force=MassXAcceleration, not Force=MassXSpeed. What this means is that the closer you or any object are to earth, the more the earth pulls on you and the effect of distance is exponentially multiplied. What this means is that if you halve the distance, you do not double the force but quadruple it. What does all this mean? What this means is that when you stand on your head causing body material to move towards your head due to gravity and thus farther from earth when you are upright again if done quickly, the body material will be "pulled" less. Consequently, you could and should weigh slightly less. The question then becomes what is slightly, and is it enough to register on commonly used scales. Sometimes it works and sometimes it does not. I have seen it work either because of physics or luck, but I have seen it work and I have seen it work on digitals as well. That is the science which is indisputable and irrefutable (unless one is in denial).

Re: losing weight #75658 01/26/05 08:30 PM
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 551
J
Jim Gaither Offline
Member
Offline
Member
J
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 551
Quote:
Originally posted by WSEWC:
What this means is that when you stand on your head causing body material to move towards your head due to gravity and thus farther from earth when you are upright again if done quickly, the body material will be "pulled" less. Consequently, you could and should weigh slightly less. The question then becomes what is slightly, and is it enough to register on commonly used scales.
Not in denial (your science is correct) but, I would argue that the distance from your feet to your head and the amount of mass that has changed locations, is way too insignificant to create a measurable (0.2 lbs.) difference in body weight. I am however open to a scientific trial of the above possibility. This would have to be done under controlled conditions. My questions for anyone who claims this has worked for them is what else transpired between the first weigh in and the second. You can easily lose 0.1 lbs. in one hour by doing almost nothing at all (assuming no fluid or solid intake). Let's put it to the test!!
P.S. - I commend you for an excellent response. (Some people think that only dullard oafs visit this forum.)
P.P.S. - I see from your profile that you are a teacher. I would have been more impressed if you were a student. :p Nevertheless, I am glad we have teachers/coaches of your caliber.

Re: losing weight #75659 01/26/05 09:14 PM
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 696
Dingbat Offline
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 696
I'm with Jim. While WSEWC's analogy may make a difference on a much larger scale (pun intended), a 112 pound wrestler will not displace enough body fluid to make a .3 lbs. difference. So I stand by my previous statement of "this is the most retarded notion I have ever heard of. Boo, high school science/physics teachers."


Congrats, Aquinas!
Great job, Hat Town!
Salyer Rules!
Re: losing weight #75660 01/27/05 02:37 AM
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 448
M
Michael Malay Offline
Member
Offline
Member
M
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 448
poop. or gag urself

Re: losing weight #75661 01/27/05 03:01 AM
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,538
B
Bronco Wrestler Offline
Member
Offline
Member
B
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,538
I have seen this work myself, as i have done this myself, it works for some reason, the most i've lost is .2lbs but i've seen it happen the kid is .1 over and he stands on his head for a while then hops back on and is right on weight then steps on after weighing in and is .1 over again? not sure why/if it really does work but kinda interesting


Alex R. Ryan
KSHSAA Official #15616
USAWKS Official #707
Re: losing weight #75662 01/28/05 07:12 PM
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 984
X
XGHSWC Offline
Member
Offline
Member
X
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 984
Thank you for commending me on my very excellent reply, Mr. Gaither. You are correct, I am quite crafty. I am so smart, I am sure that I could best the great Prant Garker in a spelling bee. As for pegging me a teacher though, you are, alas, not correct. Although I wish I was, as that is what I aspire to be. Or at least that is what I aspired to be until some goof off from the school of rock told me that those who can't do, teach and those who can't teach, teach gym. I am just a lowly student/athlete who happens to be a 4.0 who is also aspiring to be valedictorian or at least salutatorian. But I did study under a great teacher, Sir Isaac Newton, I met him on an excellent adventure with Bill and Ted. Your kind words though Gaither Man have inspired me to perhaps pursue my dream once more of being a physics teacher/wrestling coach. And do not boo physics/science teachers you Mr. dingbat you because the science behind the weight loss phenomenon is indeed still correct. I myself in my own response stated that the difference might not be enough to register but it is still a difference you Mr. dingbat you, did you not read my response in it's entirety. Regardless, I have seen it work and it should work due to the science. Again I state, I do not know if it happens because of luck or totally due to the laws of physics or perhaps even some other undetermined anomalies, but I have seen it work and on a digital I might add.

Re: losing weight #75663 01/28/05 09:06 PM
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 696
Dingbat Offline
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 696
Quote:
I myself in my own response stated that the difference might not be enough to register but it is still a difference you Mr. dingbat you, did you not read my response in it's entirety.
At least you don't want to teach English.


Congrats, Aquinas!
Great job, Hat Town!
Salyer Rules!
Re: losing weight #75664 01/28/05 09:10 PM
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,152
LancerM Offline
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,152
Your posts are getting a little wordy WSEWC.

And by wordy I mean way too long and boring to read. Let's shorten it up man.

Re: losing weight #75665 01/28/05 10:41 PM
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 360
coachtwink Offline
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 360
Here is the ultimate solution, move the scale to the second floor of the building. That is much more of a difference than moving aobut 1/8 a pound of blood 5 feet (from your feet to your head). Will either method change how much you weigh, not any measureable amount. Why did it work for those other knuckleheads- because they were probably too dizzy to stand still. If they were using an old school scale the movement would cause the scale to "Break". If it was a digital scale, you have a crappy scale.

When I was cutting weight, I always wanted to weigh in at Denver, since it is a mile higher than where I used to live. I thought that would make a difference. The thing I was not accounting for is the certification of the scales. They are supposed to be certified with precise weights, which if they were all made at the same place should weigh the same. The scale in Denver would be adjusted so that the 50 pound weight would cause the scale to read 50 pounds, just like the scale at sea level. The realization of that caused a profound sense of loss. I then moved on to deciding which organs I could live with out, Appendix, wisdom teeth, 1 kidney, etc.

Oh yeah, I am a science teacher.

Boo Junior High Boys Basketball Coaches!!


Any fool can criticize, complain, and condemn- and most do.
Re: losing weight #75666 01/29/05 03:35 AM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 7
C
cansas103 Offline
Member
Offline
Member
C
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 7
Losing weight whats that?? Yea its kinda nice for me I weigh in at 97 with my cloths on I dont have to worry about cutting weight.


Josh Smith
Page 1 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  Nate Naasz, RedStorm 

Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 291 guests, and 3 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
bvswwrestling, CoachFitzOS, Dluce, Shawn Russell, CorbinPickerill
12302 Registered Users
Forum Statistics
Forums10
Topics35,964
Posts250,402
Members12,302
Most Online709
Nov 21st, 2011
Top Posters(All Time)
usawks1 8,595
smokeycabin 6,248
Aaron Sweazy 5,255
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.2
(Release build 20190702)
PHP: 7.2.34 Page Time: 0.023s Queries: 14 (0.003s) Memory: 0.8474 MB (Peak: 1.1152 MB) Data Comp: Off Server Time: 2024-06-10 06:31:34 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS