Thanks for advertising my 2nd job Bill. I can remove fences in your pasture pretty effeciently.

I looked at the 3A 112 and my formula would require a change in the States formula. Here is my adjustment based on the criteria and my rational for the change.

3A 112
Change Regional "C" & "D" designations
There are two returning State Placers and one undefeated record in the bracket. Since one of the placers is a returning champion I would seperate him from the other two criteria's.
this would leave Hase of Silver Lake on the bottom by himself and place Frye of Eureka returning placer and Rogers of Smith Center who is undefeated on the top half. If Hase's only loss is to Rogers then this would give him a rematch in the finals if they both make it. Here is what it would look like.

1A Frye - Eureka 6th @ 103 31 - 5
4D Geist - Osborne

2C Keiswetter - norton
3B Phillips - ACCHS

1D Rogers - SmithCenter 33 - 0
4A Soliday - Flinthills

2B Bingham - Burlingame
3C Cemen - P burg

1C Campbell - Oakley 31 - 5
4B Wehner - Rosseville

2A Weber - Westelk
3D Janzen - hesston

1B Hase - Silverlake
4C Stucky - Scott City

2D Weigle - Plainville
3D Orsi - Wich Indep

Hope this helps show what the formula would do.