"How govt can support schools that teach evolution (anti-religion), against the constitution, and not support private schools is bull." This was his argument, secular funding is contradictory to his religious vs. evolution argument.

If a state can fund evolution, why not religion?

1) Religion isn't secular
2) Evolution is a very BROAD way to look at things (secular)

There is a reason for the establishment clause, it is in our founding regulations. To stray from a strict interpretation of the constitution is to stray from the country itself (in my opinion).

Now, if the parochial school is benefiting student positively without mention of god, then church and state has been separated and funding can/should be allocated.