First of all….I don’t claim to have anything in my favor because I don’t have a side in this debate...I am simply looking for the truth. Don’t pose ridiculous questions like…Are you an adult?...and then use high school science fairs in your rational...but since you asked...I am man...sorta like a caveman...no more challenges...they make cavemen uneasy.

Micro-evolution can be clearly demonstrated in the Laboratory (I will provide references if you like)... While macro-evolution occurs over many millions of years. However, macro-evolution is repeatable…it just takes a long period of time….not something you will see in your lifetime...or for that matter many many lifetimes....like many sciences.

The theory of evolution rests upon a widespread pattern of evidence from a number of different scientific fields. Are there limits to how far an organism can change? That is a debatable point...but the fact that organisms change genetically and physically is just not debatable.

The vast majority of scientists accept evolution as science...including PhD’s! That said...there are many holes and gaps in the evidence for evolution, but evolution does not contradict any solid findings in any of the physical sciences...
On a side note...believing everything because it is from a PhD is like believing everything you read on the internet...."Question everything (including evolution) to understand anything"...even that cutting edge science at those high school science fairs you speak of.