I agree about revisting this issue BUT it is wasted time in an already busy day at the meeting, until we can convince the clubs in District 1 that 6U State is a good idea. You know District 1? They are the district that routinely votes against a 6U State while holding not one but two unofficial 6U state tournaments.
I'm a newbie, but why does Dist. 1 need to be convinced of anything. If Districts 2-4 are all on the same page, shouldn't the votes of 3 districts outweigh the votes of one?
