I'm not sure about that reasoning smokey. I would like to think that the last thing the guys that are in the finals are thinking about prior/during their state championship match is a potential "next match". If they are, then I'd say their in trouble from the first whistle. I don't beleive they should need any additional motivation (if thats what you're considering a possible challenge match?) to wrestle their hardest in a State Championship final. My son has experience being Challenged at Tulsa Natls. twice, and did win them both, but I didnt care for it and couldnt suppot it. It is extremely hard to get them emotionally ready in 30 minutes after losing something they wanted more than anything in the world at that time.
Heck, its very realistically possible that my son could benefit this year from a challenge match format the way his bracket is structured at State and I still wouldnt advocate it. I would prefer to see that it was structured correctly from the beginning with #1 and #2 on opposite sides. That I would support. I disagree with the arguement that "you have to beat them all anyway", and agree with you that a "silver tastes better than a bronze". But I think setting the bracket up properly in the beginning is better than having a challenge match to decide it.