One last shot at this little technique argument I either started or responded to lol I can't remember. Travius I used exactly the example that I wanted to use. Nick Flynn was perfect on his feet. He got the takedowns he needed and hammered like a son of a gun from the top. My brother was the perfect example his junior year. He wrestled 28 matches, he only got 28 takedowns all year, he had no nearfalls, none absolutely zero. Now you all would probably say he was just pitiful on his feet and probably wasn't very good on the top. The trouble with that argument is that he had 28 falls too. He used to say if you don't let them back up you don't have to do all that work over again. That story is more funny than relevant but in Flynn's case, that is precisely the example I meant to use.