I saw the wrestler throw a punch at the other wrestler (not the mat); this wrestler was then examined by a trainer. The crowd watching it reacted very negatively; it wasn't only me who saw it. The point I'm trying to make is why wasn't this wrestler disqualified? The rules need to be enforced consistently.
Because he DID NOT hit him. I won't argue your perspective of if it was going at the other wrestler. We'll have to agree to disagree. If the official thought it was intended to hit the other wrestler, he probably would have rightfully kicked him out. Obviously he did not. I don't recall why the other wrestler was looked at by the trainer, but I will tell you this; I had a very good view of the "punch" and it did not come close to the other boy. Your point is taken, but it is based on an incorrect assumption of the event.
