|
|
|
 Re: Question - Seeding Bye
[Re: Pelland]
#144042
03/17/09 02:14 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 33
Jim Lund
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 33 |
I had to re-seed that bracket because I "assumed" that they would have been seeded in the same winning order they left the sub-district in.
But how it was better clarified to me was that the 1st 4 placing wrestler on the west side kept there earned spot. The 5th and 6th earned placers had the opportunity to be alternative wrestlers on the east's side of the bracket. They then filled the bracket in there earned ordered placing ( those in this scenario were 1st and 2nd seed ).
I hope this clarifies this a little.
Jim Lund
|
|
|
|
Re: Question - Seeding Bye
[Re: Jim Lund]
#144043
03/17/09 02:29 AM
|
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 387
Pelland
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 387 |
I just looked at the bracket...1st & 2nd place kids both get byes (as they should), 3rd place kid wrestles 6th place kid and 4th place kid wrestles 5th place kid.....works for me.
My only problem is.........if this is allowed in subs and district, why not State. I'm not sure I agree or disagree with allowing these kids to advance, but why not stay consistant.
I have a problem....I'm good at sitting on both sides of the fence. I would be able to agree with arguements from both sides on this matter.
|
|
|
|
Re: Question - Seeding Bye
[Re: Pelland]
#144044
03/17/09 02:30 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,377
ReDPloyd
OP
Member
|
|
OP
Member
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,377 |
I'm going to go get a piece of paper and work up a bracket....I'll chime back in a second. Greg, Please hurry up. I think my head is going to explode any minute. Must.......have........answer.......before I go to bed...............fading...........lights are going dim.............fading....................fading....................Go Greenbacks!!!
Lee Girard
|
|
|
|
Re: Question - Seeding Bye
[Re: ReDPloyd]
#144045
03/17/09 02:31 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,377
ReDPloyd
OP
Member
|
|
OP
Member
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,377 |
Darn it Greg, you beat me to the punch(line).
Lee Girard
|
|
|
|
Re: Question - Seeding Bye
[Re: ReDPloyd]
#144046
03/17/09 02:34 AM
|
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 387
Pelland
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 387 |
Makes you stop and think a bit. I think I'm leaning towards 1-4 only, but we all say the cream rises to the top, and allowing the kids to advance even though they weren't top 4 still gives them and those more mat time. Heck I don't know.
What do you guys think...
Last edited by Pelland; 03/17/09 02:35 AM.
|
|
|
|
Re: Question - Seeding Bye
[Re: Pelland]
#144047
03/17/09 02:38 AM
|
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 4
RSS5
Junior Member
|
|
Junior Member
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 4 |
Jim and Lee; Thanks, It is an interesting discussion and topic; I can see both sides of why and/or why not to allow such substituions. Some kids will be helped by it and others will be hurt by it. Not sure where i come down on it at this point; but I do know this, I don't plan on losing any sleep over it one way or the other. LOL; Have a great night guys!
|
|
|
 Re: Question - Seeding Bye
[Re: RSS5]
#144048
03/17/09 02:44 AM
|
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 387
Pelland
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 387 |
I know........If the sub district uses an 8-man bracket w/ 5 kids, then let the 5th kid go. It should have been a RR in the first place. 
|
|
|
|
|
0 registered members (),
263
guests, and 1
spider. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Forums10
Topics35,968
Posts250,406
Members12,302
| |
Most Online709
Nov 21st, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
