Well, since I was the only non-board member to show up at the meeting let me say this. Topeka was the only sensible bid, and I REALLY don't like saying that. The members had no choice but to accept Topeka's bid. I looked at all three. Hays just wasn't big enough. Wichita didn't seem to really want it. Topeka was the only sensible choice.

Even though the topics were not discussed. I did hear talk of adding 6U, shortening the season, adding an 18U for a grand state. In my opinion the majority of the board is looking towards change...just not immediate gratification. I spoke and asked the committee to only accept a 1 year bid. I understand why they chose 3 and can live with that. If change is not made in 3 years, then all the ranting on this forum will be justified.

I do know that the board is meeting this summer, which is something that has never happened before. Hopefully we will all be pleasently surprised by the topics that will be voted on at the state meeting in November.