I still do not understand the view that this motion cannot be revised and still go into effect this year. Our rules, per our constitution, allows this as has been pointed out. In fact, how long ago on this thread did someone ask Richard to explain his position. I would assume EVERYONE on this forum has a RIGHT to know how he justifies his position - and not just Richard doesn't play well with others - but where in Roberts Rules he gets the justification for this. And, Ned- what is your view?? Chad, Jeff, Shawn and others have approached this in a very rational, adult manner - trying to come up with an option that works for all - and have received no cooperation. Unacceptable.