Originally Posted By: Ben Dover
Nice post gymmom I agree 100%. After seeing the venomous reactions to ex-coaches original post, I went back and reread it, to see what justified the harsh reactions from the chief and the tag-a-longs. What I read was a fact based, concise, to the point post. It was clear to me that he was diplomatically avoiding naming any names to keep from ruffling any feathers(we all see how that worked out!). What I didn’t see was a personal attack on anyone!
I guess we should all just ignore the fact that Ex-Coach had a legitimate argument and angrily tell him, he is a fool, and we are waiting for him to make up is own rankings!


Totally disagree, with all due respect. The post was definitely derogatory and it attacked the rankings and the ranker. Your tag-a-long comment was totally derogatory as well. There are no tag-a-longs to Chief. That's like saying that Keith Richards is a tag-a-long to Mick Jagger, or that Doc Holliday was a tag-a-long to Wyatt Earp, or that Mike Gundy was a tag-a-long to Barry Sanders, or that Rudolph is a tag-a-long to Santa Claus, or that the Disciples were tag-a-longs to Jesus Christ, get it. They are all merely people (except Rudolph) with common interests, opinions, philosophies perhaps and ambitions.