I'm going to guess a No-call, just like it was in the original match. It wasn't a question of in bounds or out of bounds, etc. It was matter of control, which is not questionable (seeing a video won't matter, now on the line or off the line yes). I'd venture to guess he would never have reversed the call based on a review.

It has to be "indisputable evidence" to overturn the call just like the NFL, and from the video I've seen, nothing sticks out in my mind to overturn the call.

Just my $.02... Alex