"Kids is not as tough as it could be, and Middle School is not nearly as tough as it should be. The competition for both is weaker during this time. So my statement that Kids is not as tough is true. Kids will get tougher when the Middle School comes back."

You did not say Kids is not AS tough. You titled your post "14U/12U competition weak." You said the Salina competition was "okay at best." You said the "competition is not strong in either." And you said, "NEITHER is that impressive."

I disagree and proposed an objective way to measure it.

You are entitled to your opinion and you might be right. But you don't get to redefine your argument and declare yourself correct about a point you did not make when you have lost the point you did make.

Obviously, if wrestlers are split up, one or both are weaker than they could be. You need to decide which point you are trying to make. That Kids is weaker than it could be? Presuming there is even one kid in middle school that can win a match in Kids, this is true and so obvious it need not even be said. But to call it weak, okay, competition not strong, and not that impressive does not support your argment. It criticizes Kids and adds little to your "support Middle school" argument.