|
Sub-Numbers
#228279
03/16/14 06:04 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 933
Brent Lane
OP
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 933 |
Just looking at numbers of districts and was curious about others thoughts. here they are below. Redistricting?
District 1 8 & Under 128 North 118 South =246 District 2 8 & Under 70 North 101 South =171 District 3 8 & Under 124 East 92 West=116 District 4 8 & Under 103 South 79 North=182
District 1 10 & Under 130 North 119 South=249 District 2 10 & Under 74 North 80 South =154 District 3 10 & Under 99 East 94 West=193 District 4 10 & Under 90 South 72 North=162
District 1 12 & Under 129 North 95 South=224 District 2 12 & Under 81 North 80 South =160 District 3 12 & Under 86 East 91 West=177 District 4 12 & Under 91 South 52 North=143
District 1 14 & under 129 North 104 South=233 District 2 14 & under 90 North 82 South =172 District 3 14 & under 91 East 87 West=178 District 4 14 & under 71 South 56 North=137
District 1 High School 85 North 61 South=146 District 2 High School 45 North 17 South = 62 District 3 High School 61 East 34 West=95 District 4 High School 39 South 39 North=78
Last edited by Coach Lane; 03/16/14 06:05 PM.
"If it is to be, it is up to me!"
|
|
|
Re: Sub-Numbers
[Re: Brent Lane]
#228344
03/17/14 07:13 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 933
Brent Lane
OP
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 933 |
In all honesty, I was hoping someone would share their thoughts on this. If someone had the time and inclination to do so, could you look back at the last 5 years and see what the trends are? Is there a need to change?
"If it is to be, it is up to me!"
|
|
|
Re: Sub-Numbers
[Re: Brent Lane]
#228346
03/17/14 07:39 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 97
roughly
Member
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 97 |
Well Lane, what are your thoughts on ReDistricting? It would appear you have some/one. I would imagine that they would need some data a few years back to see if this is the correct decision or not. One year does not necessarily necessitate change! UNLESS you are referring to the Oblamer "presidency" and THEN I'd agree change would be needed!!!
Rob Roughly
|
|
|
Re: Sub-Numbers
[Re: Brent Lane]
#228347
03/17/14 07:48 PM
|
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 162
John Taylor
Member
|
Member
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 162 |
From the looks of those numbers I think there is no doubt that redistricting needs done. D1 - 1098 kids D2 - 720 kids D3 - 859 kids D4 - 702 kids
Opportunity for the state series for the kids are no where near equal in each district.
|
|
|
Re: Sub-Numbers
[Re: John Taylor]
#228348
03/17/14 08:04 PM
|
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 162
John Taylor
Member
|
Member
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 162 |
2013 at a glance looks pretty much the same, except there were more kids in subs in every district last year. Wonder why that is?
D1 - 1118 D2 - 821 D3 - 925 D4 - 740
Opportunity for the state series for the kids last year (2013) was no where near equal in each district.
|
|
|
Re: Sub-Numbers
[Re: John Taylor]
#228350
03/17/14 09:16 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 933
Brent Lane
OP
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 933 |
My belief is this had been looked at before and the powers that be feel there was no change needed. My thinking on this is if things were to be evened out it would make district 4 even larger and travel distance even greater, I also believe if change is to be made an extensive study of the numbers for several years past needs to be used and all districts need represented.
Also, because of population trends, some clubs have had travel so as not to be included in District 1.
Last edited by Coach Lane; 03/17/14 09:24 PM.
"If it is to be, it is up to me!"
|
|
|
|
0 registered members (),
300
guests, and 2
spiders. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums10
Topics35,989
Posts250,449
Members12,302
|
Most Online709 Nov 21st, 2011
|
|
|
|
|