We've digressed. I was looking for direct feedback to the hierarchical criteria list at the onset of this stream. A general set of guidelines that any tournament could use. I feel the true second match is impractical and could also be impeded by the five match NFHSA restricrion. Every tournament has some good ideas and there are some that get totally wacky. Some coaches have team scoring more in mind than the goal of equitable separation. I would just like to see direct critiquing of the initially listed points of seeding emphasis.