I won't argue the stalling calls but the rules were not followed at the end of the match and 90% of the arena was confused. When Kester was called for the 4th stalling Younger was awarded 2 points. The action should have been stopped at this point, about 20 seconds left, and Younger should've been given choice of position. I'm assuming he would've chose to remain on bottom with a 4-3 lead after the 2 points. Kester probably would've given up an escape and tried to get a takedown to tie up the match. Assuming he was able to do this, they go into overtime tied 5-5 and a takedown wins the match.

What actually happened was action was never stopped. The escape happened after the double stall point, then the takedown happened to tie the score at 5 to send it into overtime. 13 seconds into overtime an official sitting in the chairs told the side official about the rule awarding choice after the 2 point stalling. So the side official stopped the match to tell the lead official. She decided to restart the overtime period and give Younger choice. He chose down and had a minute to get an escape or another stall call. This left Kester having to get a ride out just to get to double OT or a turn for the win. That's a hard position to be in for anyone.

Regardless of the what you think stalling is, the end of the match was officiated wrong.