I think we need to develop 2-3 proposals for the body to vote on while keeping the below things in mind. We can�t lock into 1 scenario without actual detailed research of the plan and risk the house on it. We have to have a detailed plan with facts not all assumptions.

Remain objective, not allowing personality or one person�s sensing of �what the mass wants� to influence them. We must avoid defending a proposal just because we personally developed it.

Accurately point out advantages and disadvantages to the proposal as they become evident.

Assess feasibility, acceptability, and suitability of the proposal. If it fails any of these test during �practice planning� it must be rejected.

Avoid drawing premature conclusions.

This could be a major change to our sport, we have to do it right.