I am only a humble assistant coach, not currently a head coach like many of the dudes commenting on this topic, but I will chime in with a couple of thoughts as to why some people might be against this idea(or at the very least against a set up where there are an unlimited # of entries per team):
1)For newer schools struggling to get the program off the ground, they would perceive that it lessens the chance to sneak a state qualifier or two...and for a newer program a qualifier or two is to them what more medalists are to big, established programs...and provides them with the chance to show success, progress and recruit to move the program towards that stronger level.
2)I suspect some smaller schools in some of the classes would have a similar position or idea(and perhaps some of the KCK schools as well).

In both those cases, the idea that stronger, more established programs with deeper talent wells could conceivably eat up those marginal spots would likely be part of their arguments against.

Now, I have served over several years in various capacities in both strong, deep established programs as well as (now) in a new and growing program so I see both sides of the issue. I am sure there are those that will say "tough toenails" to the arguments of those small schools and those new/growing programs. And that's cool. But I honestly think if we want to see KS wrestling continue to flourish in all corners of the state then at the very least those concerns ought to be part of the discussion-whether people agree or not. It isn't college(ie: NAIA) so I'm really feeling that's not even part of this equation. Instead it should be what everyone determines is best overall for Kansas wrestlers and wrestling. Having been on both sides I'm not sure what that is...but I think there are some complicated issues to work through if anyone want a consensus on the idea.

Thanks,
Mike McLaughlin
Olathe West ass't coach(these days)