personally, i think that the heavy-weight from norton, sprigg, should've gotten OW, because without sprigg winning an overtime nail-biter in the finals, there wouldve been a split for the championship team, before the match the team score was tied with norton at 166 1/2 and bishop carroll's 166 1/2 another thought, if sprigg had lost that match i think the OW shouldve gone to mitch arnold, 135 BC, because correct me if im wrong but he was the only champion for bishop carroll....
i think there is so much more criteria to look at before automatically choosing a OW by saying one weight is the hardest, maybe other things should be taken into consideration...