I said Wichita wrestling is bad because out of all the people in that area, only a small number of outstanding wrestlers are produced. The ratio of good wrestlers to bad wrestlers is absurd. I would also double dog dare you to find me a lineup of Bishop Carrol in 2003-2004. Not only would we have beat them in a dual, but we would have dominated. If their best wrestler could be beaten by Manhattan by 6-8 like the case was every single time, then how do you expect the rest of the team to step up and win? And WSEWC, it was not a punk thing to do. You did the punk thing and spoke on issues you're not associated with. You don't know me, kansaswrestler, or anyone from Manhattan at that time, so your information is quite limited, as always. Have a nice day gentleman.

I would also like to say that I agree with Alex. You shouldn't do whole teams in the same association with best wrestlers. The only real way to settle it, is to have top 2 from each classification battle it out. Then on a later date, take the top 4 from each classification and see who's the best. That way you have a 16 man bracket and you will get the wrestlers who placed 3rd maybe because of a bad call on the front side.