Some background info. on the Dual State proposal FYI:

The proposal was the result of extensive polling of all coaches in Kansas over the course of the last two years. Several proposals were presented in a variety of methods, mailings, surveys, meetings, etc. After numerous hours of meeting and discussions, the current Dual State proposal was formulated. To explain all of the details, reasons, rationale, etc. would take a very long time. Every area of the state has been represented at these meetings, and youth to collegiate coaches were involved also.

In regards to the Dual State vs. Grand State issue, one of the many reasons behind choosing to push for a Dual State is that it recognizes and involves more kids and more programs, whereas a Grand State only recognizes the few individuals who already recieve much recognition for their accomplishments, and rightfully so. But I think the many educators involved in the development of this proposal liked the idea of involving more kids in the excitement of a state-level competition, not less kids. We felt the fans would be enthusiastic about and be entertained by either competition, but more would benefit from a Dual State (more teams involved).

Also, the fact that a Grand State was already attempted and dropped, we felt perhaps a Dual State had a better opportunity for success. Research by Doug Moore (Concordia) told us that 21 states have a Dual State tournament and in their survey responses every one had very positive comments and feelings about that event. They said it was by far one of the most exciting events of their seasons. They also said it was fan and media friendly, and was a financial success.

Wrestling is unique in that we compete in two different formats with potentially very different results, Team A can defeat Team B in a tournament but Team B would win in a dual format. A Dual State would reward programs for dual success even though they may not have the team makeup to finish as high in a tournament format.

I personally recall mailing and posting on the KWCA and USAW-KS sites the meeting times, sites, etc., inviting all coaches to participate and provide input on the issue. These meetings have been held in Chanute, Topeka, Hays, Salina, and at numerous regional/state meetings held over the last two years. The summer meetings attracted over 60 coaches combined at two meeting sites: Chanute and Topeka. The input received from these discussions have probably been about 99% positive to approximately 1% negative so far. I also requested feedback, ideas, suggestions, etc., from anyone in the Kansas wrestling community. . .the ideas presented in each email, phone call, etc., were all taken to these meetings to share and discuss.

The KWCA has always acted on behalf of the coaches and kids it serves. This year at the 3-1A State Tourney coaches meeting, the question was asked whether or not to continue pushing for a Dual State Tournament, the result was 58-0 in favor. In 4A, 5A, and 6A coaches packets, the same question was asked. Two "no" votes and over 50 "yes" votes were submitted.

The KWCA will continue to provide its work on behalf of the coach's wishes, if this is for or against a Dual State, then that is the direction the KWCA will act. Currently, the overwhelming majority has expressed support for the possible addition of a Dual State tournament. It may pass, it may not, but at this point the KWCA is attempting to accomplish what the KS coaches have requested.

I just wanted to share some helpful information on this topic. Please feel free to email, call, etc., as all input is valued in our continued push as to what is best for the kids involved in wrestling in our state.

Sincerely,
Kit Harris, Baldwin HS
KWCA member
kharris@usd348.com