I do believe Kevin has been a loss to the Metro Area wrestling. But do not under-estimate the importance of riding time at the college level. I was just skimming some of the notes from this years NCAA I semi-finals. Bunch over Reiter 1:58 riding time 6-4 final score (that is a taken down cushion in case of over time). Gallick over Simmons 2 minutes riding time 2-0 final score. Rosholt over Padden 10-9 with 1:11 riding time - that was the difference in the match. Riding time determines more matches than you think with some of the top guys. I am sure the guys at Stanford are well aware of the significance of riding time. In close matches there are a few reasons to ride an opponent. One is the obvious to score back points and the second is the riding time advantage - 1 point in college. For most collegiate wrestlers they may be warned for stalling quicker on top than the bottom guy who is trying to escape. Also the most energy is used by the top man when trying to hold down an escape artist. That is the give him 1 not 2 points Theory. A lot of those wrestlers/riders will look to score feet to back points when the man stands up - rather than trying to turn the opponent on the mat. When they are both on their feet you can see who is the more aggressive wrestler - in most cases. The wrestler who goes out of bounds with their back facing out gets the warning the majority of time. My point is - if you have a complete wrestler - college coaches will notice them. A college recruiter would want a take down, escape, and pinner/rider wrestler first. If that recruiter's other choice was just a take down and escape guy he would be second you can be sure of that. Just my two cents.