I am a little new to this forum thing and don't read it alot but just looking over it brings me to a conclusion:
Mr Isom, you must have lots of time on your hands because I see your name quite often on here making statements, defending statements, and all-in-all lots of wasted time backtracking. I don't understand why you feel the need to respond so much to things that should be water off a duck's back. Move on!
I got on here to read people's opinion of the 'best match at the bobcat' and end up reading about interpretations of the rulebook and who is right and who is wrong. To get things back on track I thought Wiscombe vs Malloy was the best match, but a close second was Peterson vs Deeds. I was thinking Peterson was crazy for not cutting him at the end but it all worked out. Great tournament!
Also, Mr Isom you will probably prove my point about having too much time by responding to this.