Yep--sorry on the miscount. However, the rest of the information, including the point total of 28 for the Hesston Regional, is correct.

What does the fact that the three Hesston Regional champions are underclassmen have to do with anything? Several of the champions were underclassmen, as they are every year.

One other fact that was not included earlier:
The top five pacing teams and eight of the top ten were from the Norton Regional.

The percentage of State medals won by wrestlers from the Norton Regional is as follows:

1/2 = 18 of 28 65%
3/4 = 15 of 28 53%
5/6 = 11 of 28 39%

To determine the relative rankings of each of the four 321A regionals, the following system was used: a regionals' first place medalist was awarded six points, second received five and so on through sixth which was one point.

Norton Regional: 168 points
1st =10; 2nd =8; 3rd =5; 4th = 10; 5th=7;6th=4

Hoistington Regional: 49 pts
1st=0; 2nd=4; 3rd=4; rth=1; 5th=3; 6th=1

Easton Regional: 49
1st=1; 2nd=2; 3rd=4; 4th=2; 5th=4; 6th=3

Hesston Regional: 28
1st=3; 2nd=0; 3rd=1; 4th=1; 5th=0; 6th=3

# of Medalists by regional:
Norton = 44
Easton = 16
Hoisington = 16
Hesston =8

Regional Placers by weight class:

103
Norton 3
Hesston 2
Hoistington 1
Easton 0

112
Norton 3
Easton 2
Hosinton 1
Hesston 0

119
Norton 3
Hoistington 2
Easton 1
Hesston 0

125
Norton 3
Hesston 3
Hoistington 0
Easton 0

130
Norton 3
Hoistington 2
Hesston 1
Easton 0

135
Norton 2
Easton 2
Hoisington 1
Easton 1

140
Norton 4
Easton 2
Hoisington 0
Hesston 0

145
Norton 4
Easton 2
Easton 1
Hoisington 0

152
Norton 4
Hesston 1
Easton 1
Hoisington 0

160
Norton 3
Hoisington 2
Hesstion 1
Easton 0

171
Norton 4
Hoisington 1
Easton 1
Heston 0

189
Norton 3
Hoisington 1
Hesston 1
Easton 1

215
Norton 2
Easton 2
Hesston 1
Hesston 1

275
Norton 3
Easton 2
Hoisington 1
Hesston 0