I agree, Strawn is a great wrestler and a great kid. It was not his fault that the officiating was so bad in his match. Yes, I am sure he does feel cheated having to accept a win like that. As much as I like him and his awesome wrestling ability, quickness and agility at his size, I do believe that in this match he was outwrestled for once. I believe that Sutton-Kearn was consistantly aggressive all match long. There was not one second I ever saw Sutton-Kearn doing anything to stale action in the entire match. Ont the other hand, it was very obvious that Strawn was locking Sutton-Kearns hands and arms up in tieups to eat time off the clock on several occasions. So, if anyone should have received a penalty for stalling it was not Sutton-Kearn. I watched their regional match also. They wrestle very tough. I think they are both great wrestlers, but I do not believe this match should have actually been that close if earlier points had been awarded correctly in the first place. And, since Sutton-Kearn was cheated out of maybe as many as 5 points in one ealier reversal and backpoint situation, then kept coming and working his butt off to keep coming from behind, only to have the striped shirts abuse the sportmanship ethics of the whole activity is a disgrace. It is too bad there is not a board that could remove those kinds of people(pretending to be "officials") from participation in sports. They are a disgrace to all the ethics we are trying to teach young men and spectators in all sports. To take the opportunity to win away from a kid who worked so hard to overcome such awful abusive "officiating" lack-of-ethical conduct, is really a big disappointment to all of us who like to see the results of the sport..not the ego of an idiot in a stiped shirt who, obviously has no respect for the rules and ethics of the sport.