Wrestling Talk Forums supported
USA Wrestling-Kansas KWCA Wrestling Talk Forums supported & maintained by USA Wrestling-Kansas USAW USA Wrestling-Kansas 
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3
20 Weight Brackets #142351 03/04/09 01:51 PM
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 844
WillyM Offline OP
Member
OP Offline
Member
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 844
Have often wondered about the "How comes" of the 14 weight brackets for HS wrestling. Some of the differientials between brackets do not make sense, especially since kids are getting bigger and stronger (nutrition, training, weight rooms). I would hope that the current brackets are based on some kind of medically accepted growth patterns---but I realyy do not think so. Someone, sometime, somewhere wrote them down and here we are.

Why not a few more brackets-with a more standard pattern. 103 to 112 is 9 pounds, or an 8.7% growth factor. 135 to 140 is only 5 pounds and a 3.7% growth factor. 160 to 171=11 pounds and 6.9%. 189 to 215 is 26 pounds and 13.8%. 215 to 285 is 70 pounds and 32% growth factor.

I would agree with keeping the 5 pound differientials from 125 through 152 because thats where the majority of kids will fall (remember the bell curve when you went to school and the teacher explained why you got that "F" grade). Back to wrestling, why not a 168 weight (5% increase), 176 bracket (5% increase), 185 bracket (5+%), 196 bracket (6% increase), 209 bracket (7%), 224 bracket (7%), 240 bracket (7%), 260 bracket (8%), 280 (8%). Would also recomend a 103 109, 115, 120 brackets in the lowest weights (vice 103, 112, 119).

My numbers result in 20 weight brackets. May be too many, may be not enough. But, makes more sense to me than the current system. Puts more kids on the mats in more weights, probably cuts down on cutting weight, and makes it easier for kids to go up or down to fit into a bracket.

Last edited by Contrarian; 03/04/09 11:21 PM.

Bill Mason Lansing
Re: 14 Weight Brackets [Re: WillyM] #142376 03/04/09 03:10 PM
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 166
powercat1 Offline
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 166
I do agree with the upper weights(171,189,215,285)its hard for a 195-200 lb wrestler to cut to 189 and giving away 10-14 pounds cant help either, not to mention the 230 pound guy. But....

How many of the smaller schools could actually fill a 20 man varsity roster? That's giving up quite a few points in dual formats. There is a first year wrestling program at a school in the town I'm from and I don't think even combining the Var/JV that they could fill a 20 man roster, They are a small 321A team.


Summertime wrestling, makes wintertime champions
Re: 14 Weight Brackets [Re: powercat1] #142381 03/04/09 03:18 PM
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 844
WillyM Offline OP
Member
OP Offline
Member
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 844
To me a dual record is a coaches record and has very little to do with akids record. If a team can not fill a weight class, so what. If walkovers are a big problem, do not count them in a wrestlers win/loss record.


Bill Mason Lansing
Re: 14 Weight Brackets [Re: powercat1] #142382 03/04/09 03:19 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,266
Ricky Bobby Offline
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,266
There is no point in adding more upper weights when for the most part it is hard enough to get heavier wrestlers to go out for wrestling. For the most part the larger kids in schools will focus on football or will play basketball. Very hard to find big boys to fill the rosters as it is, just my opinion.


[Linked Image from media1.tenor.com]
Re: 14 Weight Brackets [Re: Ricky Bobby] #142385 03/04/09 03:32 PM
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 844
WillyM Offline OP
Member
OP Offline
Member
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 844
May be so, may be not. If I was a 230 pounder and knowing I would have to spot some blob 55 pounds, I probably would not go out for wrestling. Perhaps a different story if I only have to spot 10 pounds, or lose 6 pounds down to 224.


Bill Mason Lansing
Re: 14 Weight Brackets [Re: WillyM] #142394 03/04/09 04:15 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,266
Ricky Bobby Offline
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,266
Losing 15 pounds to go down to 215 from 230 is not that hard. Heck losing 30 to go from 245 to 215 isn't that difficult. It just depends how bad the kid wants to compete at a better advantage size wise for them.


[Linked Image from media1.tenor.com]
Re: 14 Weight Brackets [Re: Ricky Bobby] #142455 03/04/09 11:11 PM
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 281
Crossface King Offline
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 281
We are loaded with kids in the upper weights, it is in the 103-119 range that we have a hard time of finding kids.
Back in the 80's, when I wrestled for Socastee HS in Myrtle Beach South Carolina, the last weight class was HWT, no limit on maximum weight, and it came after 185. The weight classes were much different then. Our HWT weighed 215 and once wrestled a young man that weighed in at 340, who could barely fit his feet into wrestling shoes. Now that was a daunting task for our wrestler.


Jonathan Whisnant
Goodland High School-USD 352
Assistant Wrestling Coach
jonathan.whisnant@usd352.org
Re: 14 Weight Brackets [Re: Crossface King] #142456 03/04/09 11:19 PM
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 844
WillyM Offline OP
Member
OP Offline
Member
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 844
Supports my proposal for more brackets!!


Bill Mason Lansing
Re: 14 Weight Brackets [Re: WillyM] #142457 03/04/09 11:22 PM
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 844
WillyM Offline OP
Member
OP Offline
Member
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 844
I just change the title of this post to 20 Weight Brackets


Bill Mason Lansing
Re: 14 Weight Brackets [Re: WillyM] #142491 03/05/09 02:50 AM
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 122
M
my12floz Offline
Member
Offline
Member
M
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 122
some blob??? WOW!!!!
you have lots of class Mr. Contrarian


Kevin Hurla
Re: 14 Weight Brackets [Re: Crossface King] #142511 03/05/09 03:58 AM
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 734
RedStorm Offline
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 734
Originally Posted By: Crossface King
We are loaded with kids in the upper weights, it is in the 103-119 range that we have a hard time of finding kids.
Back in the 80's, when I wrestled for Socastee HS in Myrtle Beach South Carolina, the last weight class was HWT, no limit on maximum weight, and it came after 185. The weight classes were much different then. Our HWT weighed 215 and once wrestled a young man that weighed in at 340, who could barely fit his feet into wrestling shoes. Now that was a daunting task for our wrestler.


Did he win?


Bill DeWitt
Wrestling Fan
Re: 14 Weight Brackets [Re: my12floz] #142512 03/05/09 04:37 AM
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 844
WillyM Offline OP
Member
OP Offline
Member
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 844
Thank you for the nice comment my12floz. Appreciate the compliment. And oh yes, Zlatnik (spelling) certainly was not a blob.

Last edited by Contrarian; 03/05/09 04:37 AM.

Bill Mason Lansing
Re: 14 Weight Brackets [Re: RedStorm] #142517 03/05/09 11:28 AM
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 281
Crossface King Offline
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 281
Originally Posted By: RedStorm
Originally Posted By: Crossface King
We are loaded with kids in the upper weights, it is in the 103-119 range that we have a hard time of finding kids.
Back in the 80's, when I wrestled for Socastee HS in Myrtle Beach South Carolina, the last weight class was HWT, no limit on maximum weight, and it came after 185. The weight classes were much different then. Our HWT weighed 215 and once wrestled a young man that weighed in at 340, who could barely fit his feet into wrestling shoes. Now that was a daunting task for our wrestler.


Did he win?


No, if I remember right he lost 3-1. The big kid was an o-lineman for Summerville HS, a powerhouse in football and Wrestling, and actually had very good footwork and balance.


Jonathan Whisnant
Goodland High School-USD 352
Assistant Wrestling Coach
jonathan.whisnant@usd352.org
Re: 14 Weight Brackets [Re: Crossface King] #142541 03/05/09 02:32 PM
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 844
WillyM Offline OP
Member
OP Offline
Member
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 844
Crossface and Redstorm. This post was about could and should HS weight brackets, In Kansas, be changed. The side comments about a 215 vs a 340 pounder in Carolina was not really germain to the post. I hate to say this I sometimes wonder if some of the posters on this page suffer from ADHD.


Bill Mason Lansing
Re: 14 Weight Brackets [Re: WillyM] #142546 03/05/09 03:12 PM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 329
S
Scooby Offline
Member
Offline
Member
S
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 329
So might it be best to have 16 weight class with better distribution of weight

like


105
111
118
125
133
142
152
165
178
191
205
220
235
250
265
285

Re: 14 Weight Brackets [Re: Scooby] #142547 03/05/09 03:15 PM
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 138
W
wrestlingspectat Offline
Member
Offline
Member
W
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 138
I'm going to have to go with no on the adding of additional weight classes. Schools have enough trouble filling out rosters as it is. In fact there was a certain state championship team from last year that didn't even have a 112 pounder this year.

I'd say the 14 classes we have now are plenty. I would however not be opposed to a redistribution of weights among those 14 classes.

Re: 14 Weight Brackets [Re: wrestlingspectat] #142548 03/05/09 03:16 PM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 329
S
Scooby Offline
Member
Offline
Member
S
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 329
I tired to get it to 14 but couldnt- didnt have the time to figure it out

Re: 14 Weight Brackets [Re: wrestlingspectat] #142550 03/05/09 03:20 PM
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 937
BLT Offline
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 937
14 to 16 weight classes is a good number. Some restructuring will be needed. Maybe spread the higher weights a little. Go above 285!

Re: 14 Weight Brackets [Re: BLT] #142551 03/05/09 03:31 PM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 329
S
Scooby Offline
Member
Offline
Member
S
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 329
How many kids cant wrestle or dont wrestle because they are over 285

How many teams fill weight 215 and 285

How many teams fill 103- 112

Re: 14 Weight Brackets [Re: Scooby] #142555 03/05/09 03:59 PM
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 844
WillyM Offline OP
Member
OP Offline
Member
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 844
All good numbers. Part of the discussion centers around several posters who believe that good wrestlers are being denied varsity opportunities, largely because their team has one or more good wrestlers in the same weight bracket, and good wrestlers (who can not win the wrestle off) are limited to JV. Other poster are worried about cutting weight and the physical effects on the wrestler. Another poster stated it is not difficult for a 245 pounder to lose down to 215. Maybe, maybe not. For big guys weight is power, not necessarily strength. A 30 lb weight (12++%) will require a lot of effort and commitment to first lose the weight, and second to spend the time in the weight room to gain the strength to replace the loss of power from the weight loss. Yes, it can be done. I think Nowak from STA is an excellent example. But, takle it from a fat boy all my life, it is difficult.

So, both more and smaller brackets may have some value in attracting more kids to the wrestling program--perhaps especiall for kids over 180 pounds. Kids are bigger today than in my days, and there are more bigger kids, so give them a slot they can fit into.

Yes, it is difficult to fill a 14 wrestler roster. Almost every school goes into several matches with open slots: big schools, medium schools, and I bet bunches of small schools. Perhaps our current system/brackets are accerbating the problem.


Bill Mason Lansing
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3

Moderated by  Nate Naasz, RedStorm 

Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 138 guests, and 2 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
CorbinPickerill, ptv, Dane Edwards, Mikemacias, tcox
12298 Registered Users
Forum Statistics
Forums10
Topics35,943
Posts250,375
Members12,298
Most Online709
Nov 21st, 2011
Top Posters(All Time)
usawks1 8,595
smokeycabin 6,248
Aaron Sweazy 5,255
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.2
(Release build 20190702)
PHP: 7.2.34 Page Time: 0.019s Queries: 15 (0.004s) Memory: 0.8521 MB (Peak: 1.1218 MB) Data Comp: Off Server Time: 2024-05-13 07:30:46 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS