Wrestling Talk Forums supported
USA Wrestling-Kansas KWCA Wrestling Talk Forums supported & maintained by USA Wrestling-Kansas USAW USA Wrestling-Kansas 
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Microevolution true Macroevolution false #189826 05/05/11 03:01 PM
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 18
F
forests Offline OP
Junior Member
OP Offline
Junior Member
F
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 18
Microevolution is true Macroevolution is false

Learn the truth:


"Evolution" mixes two things together, one real, one imaginary. Variation (microevolution) is the real part. The types of bird beaks, the colors of moths, leg sizes, etc. are variation. Each type and length of beak a finch can have is already in the gene pool for finches. Scientists have always agreed that there is variation within species. What Darwinian evolutionists do not want you to know is that there are strict limits to variation that are never crossed, something every breeder of animals or plants is aware of. Whenever variation is pushed to extremes by selective breeding (to get the most milk from cows, sugar from beets, bristles on fruit flies, or any other characteristic), the line becomes sterile and dies out. And as one characteristic increases, others diminish. But evolutionists want you to believe that changes continue, merging gradually into new kinds of creatures. This is where the imaginary part of the theory of evolution comes in. It says that new information is added to the gene pool by mutation and natural selection to create frogs from fish, reptiles from frogs, and mammals from reptiles, to name a few.

Do these big changes (macroevolution) really happen? Evolutionists tell us we cannot see evolution taking place because it happens too slowly. A human generation takes about 20 years from birth to parenthood. They say it took tens of thousands of generations to form man from a common ancestor with the ape, from populations of only hundreds or thousands. We do not have these problems with bacteria. A new generation of bacteria grows in as short as 12 minutes or up to 24 hours or more, depending on the type of bacteria and the environment, but typically 20 minutes to a few hours. There are more bacteria in the world than there are grains of sand on all of the beaches of the world (and many grains of sand are covered with bacteria). They exist in just about any environment: heat, cold, dry, wet, high pressure, low pressure, small groups, large colonies, isolated, much food, little food, much oxygen, no oxygen, in toxic chemicals, etc. There is much variation in bacteria. There are many mutations (in fact, evolutionists say that smaller organisms have a faster mutation rate than larger ones16). But they never turn into anything new. They always remain bacteria. Fruit flies are much more complex than already complex single-cell bacteria. Scientists like to study them because a generation (from egg to adult) takes only 9 days. In the lab, fruit flies are studied under every conceivable condition. There is much variation in fruit flies. There are many mutations. But they never turn into anything new. They always remain fruit flies. Many years of study of countless generations of bacteria and fruit flies all over the world shows that evolution is not happening today.


Last edited by forests; 05/05/11 03:01 PM.
Re: Microevolution true Macroevolution false [Re: forests] #189855 05/06/11 02:46 PM
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 10,433
C
Chief Renegade Offline
Member
Offline
Member
C
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 10,433
Solid post. The ultimate problem for macroevolution is that there is no known way for entirely new genetic information to be added to a genome. There is only a loss of information that sometimes produces positive results but NEVER upward evolution.

Macroevolution is an inverted fantasy.


Eric Johnson


Acts 4:12


Re: Microevolution true Macroevolution false [Re: Chief Renegade] #189859 05/06/11 05:27 PM
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 18
F
forests Offline OP
Junior Member
OP Offline
Junior Member
F
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 18
Originally Posted By: Chief Renegade
Solid post. The ultimate problem for macroevolution is that there is no known way for entirely new genetic information to be added to a genome. There is only a loss of information that sometimes produces positive results but NEVER upward evolution.

Macroevolution is an inverted fantasy.


Atleast we agree on something.

You may be interested in this book which teaches the reality of devolution:


http://www.amazon.com/Genetic-Entropy-My...6293&sr=1-1


Dr. John Sanford, a retired Cornell Professor, shows in "Genetic Entropy and the Mystery of the Genome" that the "Primary Axiom" is false. The Primary Axiom is the foundational evolutionary premise -- that life is merely the result of mutations and natural selection. In addition to showing compelling theoretical evidence that whole genomes must in fact degenerate over time, this book strongly refutes the Darwinian concept that man is just the result of a random and pointless natural process.

Re: Microevolution true Macroevolution false [Re: forests] #189969 05/10/11 11:24 PM
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 10,433
C
Chief Renegade Offline
Member
Offline
Member
C
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 10,433
Right on Forest.


Eric Johnson


Acts 4:12



Moderated by  usawks1 

Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 102 guests, and 2 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
bvswwrestling, CoachFitzOS, Dluce, Shawn Russell, CorbinPickerill
12302 Registered Users
Forum Statistics
Forums10
Topics35,949
Posts250,384
Members12,302
Most Online709
Nov 21st, 2011
Top Posters(All Time)
usawks1 8,595
smokeycabin 6,248
Aaron Sweazy 5,255
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.2
(Release build 20190702)
PHP: 7.2.34 Page Time: 0.015s Queries: 14 (0.003s) Memory: 0.7699 MB (Peak: 0.8574 MB) Data Comp: Off Server Time: 2024-05-19 00:19:34 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS