Wrestling Talk Forums supported
USA Wrestling-Kansas KWCA Wrestling Talk Forums supported & maintained by USA Wrestling-Kansas USAW USA Wrestling-Kansas 
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3
106... Lightest Weight... Really? #202443 03/06/12 06:50 AM
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 12
J
Joel499 Offline OP
Junior Member
OP Offline
Junior Member
J
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 12
I have twin boys who will be in high school in a couple of years and plan to wrestle. They have been wrestling in kids wrestling for 5 years. At their current growth rate I don't expect them to make 100 pounds by freshmen year. Since these are my first boys to be reaching high school I did not realize the lowest weight is now 106, which was recently moved up from 103. Can somebody please explain this thinking.... and is there any remote chances that a lighter weight would be added again?

Re: 106... Lightest Weight... Really? [Re: Joel499] #202444 03/06/12 07:03 AM
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 4,326
Cokeley Offline
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 4,326
The thinking is that 103 wasn't a full weight class. It is at the far left of the bell curve. The other consideration...How many FR start on varsity in any other sport? Very few. Why should a HS sport create a position that totally caters to FR? Probably not.


Will Cokeley
(708)267-6615
willcokeley@gmail.com
Re: 106... Lightest Weight... Really? [Re: Joel499] #202445 03/06/12 09:55 AM
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,377
ReDPloyd Offline
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,377
I agree with Will. I don't see this weight class going back down. I did see some very good undersized 103 pound wrestlers in 2010-2011 that were freshman who got some valuable varsity experience. This year, they were impact varsity wrestlers at 106 in their sophomore season. One that I know of struggled last year and placed at State this year.


Lee Girard
Re: 106... Lightest Weight... Really? [Re: ReDPloyd] #202446 03/06/12 10:04 AM
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,555
Beeson Offline
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,555
I think we have too many weight classes. Need to drop down to 13 weight classes. The upper-weight classes that they have added are not full either. 105, 112, 119, 126, 132, 138, 145, 152, 160, 171, 189, 215, HWT


Unnecessary Roughness is Necessary
Re: 106... Lightest Weight... Really? [Re: Beeson] #202452 03/06/12 10:43 AM
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 172
W
Wrestlin Scholar Offline
Member
Offline
Member
W
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 172
I agree as there are too many weight classes as is. I think we should go back to 12 spots. Too many open weights, including the biggest offender is the 106 lb weight class. Move up to 110, and cut out a weight class.


"If pro is the opposite on con, then the opposite of progress is congress"
Re: 106... Lightest Weight... Really? [Re: Wrestlin Scholar] #202453 03/06/12 10:57 AM
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 99
S
Scooter Offline
Member
Offline
Member
S
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 99
They will grow, my son was 67 lbs when he started 7th grade wrestling, and was 100 lbs when he started high school wrestling, 105 by the end of his freshman year. And we don't need to reduce weight classes we need to convince more kids to go out (and stay out) for wrestling.

Re: 106... Lightest Weight... Really? [Re: Scooter] #202454 03/06/12 11:00 AM
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 99
S
Scooter Offline
Member
Offline
Member
S
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 99
The difference in the quality and quantity of wrestlers from 103 2 years ago to 106 this year was night and day, no way they would or should go back.

Re: 106... Lightest Weight... Really? [Re: Wrestlin Scholar] #202455 03/06/12 11:11 AM
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,555
Beeson Offline
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,555
Originally Posted By: fan of the sport
I agree as there are too many weight classes as is. I think we should go back to 12 spots. Too many open weights, including the biggest offender is the 106 lb weight class. Move up to 110, and cut out a weight class.


Would LOVE to see it go back to 12 weights. I do disagree and think that 106 should be left alone. My kid will be heavier than 106 in High School, so I don't have a horse in the race, but I like the 106 class. I would rather see them get rid or 215 or find a weight between 189 and 215.


Unnecessary Roughness is Necessary
Re: 106... Lightest Weight... Really? [Re: Beeson] #202465 03/06/12 01:10 PM
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 12
J
Joel499 Offline OP
Junior Member
OP Offline
Junior Member
J
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 12
Thanks for the feedback.... I'm not exposed to allot of HS wrestling yet and did not realize that the lower wieght classes were shy on kid count. I was under the assumption that this affected allot of kids, guess not. If that is the case I see the thinking. However it doesn't seem reasonable to move up from 106 because it may force allot of good kids to just say home, especially if they miss the dated to continue to wrestle at 14U.... that would be a bad idea.

Re: 106... Lightest Weight... Really? [Re: Joel499] #202471 03/06/12 01:20 PM
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 211
lazyman_1 Offline
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 211
If 3 pounds makes you stay home then you weren't very good anyway.

Re: 106... Lightest Weight... Really? [Re: Beeson] #202472 03/06/12 01:20 PM
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 750
L
L.Geyer Offline
Member
Offline
Member
L
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 750
I agree with we have too many weight classes, but I am not sure where you would take out some weights. The upper weights 189, 215, HWT. These are some big jumps, so I dont think you can take any classes away from these areas.

Re: 106... Lightest Weight... Really? [Re: Joel499] #202475 03/06/12 01:33 PM
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 12
J
Joel499 Offline OP
Junior Member
OP Offline
Junior Member
J
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 12
Which brings up another question... if there is a freshmen walking around wet at 100 pounds that is not a varsity wrestler and still young enough to wrestle 14U, why not let him come back and wrestle in kids with kids his weight and still wrestle high school JV against the heavier kids to gain some high school experience as a freshman? It he wrestles in kids only he will miss out on one year of HS experience, if he wrestles in HS only he will most likely be wrestling kids cutting from 115, which doesnt seem like a good year of wrestling experience? Im just trying to understand the situation a bit better because I have a set of twins who are decent wrestlers that like to wrestle but are not growing.

Re: 106... Lightest Weight... Really? [Re: lazyman_1] #202477 03/06/12 01:38 PM
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 12
J
Joel499 Offline OP
Junior Member
OP Offline
Junior Member
J
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 12
I"m not talking 3 lbs, but thanks for the input. I'm talking about a 96 pounder (wet) wrestling kids that are cutting from 115 to wresle 106. There is a bit of difference there.

Re: 106... Lightest Weight... Really? [Re: Joel499] #202540 03/06/12 06:00 PM
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 77
Stevie08 Offline
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 77
The Keller twins adjusted accordingly, with one wrestling 112 while weighing about 96 lbs.

Re: 106... Lightest Weight... Really? [Re: Joel499] #202552 03/06/12 06:59 PM
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,010
G
GregMann Offline
Member
Offline
Member
G
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,010
". . .why not let him come back and wrestle in kids with kids his weight and still wrestle high school JV against the heavier kids to gain some high school experience as a freshman?" Joel499

Joel,

If your sons are out for high school wrestling, KIDS is unavailable to them until after the high school season is over.

If your boys wrestle KIDS instead of going out for high school wrestling, they will not be allowed to compete/practice with the high school team.


Greg Mann
Manhattan, KS
Re: 106... Lightest Weight... Really? [Re: GregMann] #202564 03/06/12 07:48 PM
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 16
1
14oldschool Offline
Junior Member
Offline
Junior Member
1
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 16
I agree we need to reduce the number of weight classes. In fact, we should just do away with the whole idea of weight classes entirely. High school wrestling is not about teaching young men to reach their full potential against equally-sized opponents. We should not worry about providing fair competition to lighter athletes who are outsized in other sports and have devoted all of their efforts to becoming the best wrestler they can be. Those little guys can sit on our bench just like they would on the basketball team.

While we are at it, we should do away with all of the classifications too. Combine the whole state, heck the whole nation, into one giant weight class with only one true champion. Anyone against this is just a softie who wants to give everyone a medal.

Re: 106... Lightest Weight... Really? [Re: 14oldschool] #202580 03/06/12 09:26 PM
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 172
W
Wrestlin Scholar Offline
Member
Offline
Member
W
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 172
14oldschool,

What did you wrestle 98 pounds back in the day?


"If pro is the opposite on con, then the opposite of progress is congress"
Re: 106... Lightest Weight... Really? [Re: Joel499] #202588 03/06/12 10:06 PM
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 4,326
Cokeley Offline
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 4,326
Originally Posted By: Joel499
Which brings up another question... if there is a freshmen walking around wet at 100 pounds that is not a varsity wrestler and still young enough to wrestle 14U, why not let him come back and wrestle in kids with kids his weight and still wrestle high school JV against the heavier kids to gain some high school experience as a freshman? It he wrestles in kids only he will miss out on one year of HS experience, if he wrestles in HS only he will most likely be wrestling kids cutting from 115, which doesnt seem like a good year of wrestling experience? Im just trying to understand the situation a bit better because I have a set of twins who are decent wrestlers that like to wrestle but are not growing.



Although Mr. Mann is technically correct we all know that rule is very gray. Technically, NO ONE is allowed in the room but eligible HS wrestlers and coaches who are signed to a paid contract. How many rooms in KS strictly follow this rule?

Depending on where you live there is most likely a club practice you can participate in.
Nothing is stopping you from doing that. I know of kids around the country that wrestle opens and do not compete in HS wrestling if they are too small or cannot make varsity their freshman year. This is especially true if a FR is behind a stud in the line up. IMO, JV is for kids that haven't wrestled before. If you are still in the 14U age group, and the tournament does not prohibit FR from participating, those tournaments are much more competitive than JV HS wrestling.

Last edited by Cokeley; 03/06/12 10:09 PM.

Will Cokeley
(708)267-6615
willcokeley@gmail.com
Re: 106... Lightest Weight... Really? [Re: Cokeley] #202590 03/06/12 10:11 PM
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 16
1
14oldschool Offline
Junior Member
Offline
Junior Member
1
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 16
Exactly. The best strategy to grow our sport is to drive as many of those little guys out the high school wrestling room as possible.

Re: 106... Lightest Weight... Really? [Re: 14oldschool] #202599 03/06/12 11:35 PM
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 172
W
Wrestlin Scholar Offline
Member
Offline
Member
W
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 172
Right 14oldschool. We need more weight classes so nobody is left out. Lets make it like middle school and have 20 weight classes. Add a 95 pound, 85 pound and dwarf weight class. Heavyweights should be unlimited again. Its not fair to all those guys over 280 either. Maybe we shouldn't keep team score either so everybody wins.


"If pro is the opposite on con, then the opposite of progress is congress"
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3

Moderated by  Nate Naasz, RedStorm 

Who's Online Now
1 registered members (Coach Vieyra), 90 guests, and 0 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
CorbinPickerill, ptv, Dane Edwards, Mikemacias, tcox
12298 Registered Users
Forum Statistics
Forums10
Topics35,936
Posts250,367
Members12,298
Most Online709
Nov 21st, 2011
Top Posters(All Time)
usawks1 8,595
smokeycabin 6,248
Aaron Sweazy 5,254
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.2
(Release build 20190702)
PHP: 7.2.34 Page Time: 0.019s Queries: 16 (0.003s) Memory: 0.8460 MB (Peak: 1.1149 MB) Data Comp: Off Server Time: 2024-05-01 22:26:26 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS