Wrestling Talk Forums supported
USA Wrestling-Kansas KWCA Wrestling Talk Forums supported & maintained by USA Wrestling-Kansas USAW USA Wrestling-Kansas 
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 3 of 5 1 2 3 4 5
Re: state 6a #32912 11/12/05 05:09 PM
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 577
billy_mcjackson_ripjc Offline
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 577
I said Wichita wrestling is bad because out of all the people in that area, only a small number of outstanding wrestlers are produced. The ratio of good wrestlers to bad wrestlers is absurd. I would also double dog dare you to find me a lineup of Bishop Carrol in 2003-2004. Not only would we have beat them in a dual, but we would have dominated. If their best wrestler could be beaten by Manhattan by 6-8 like the case was every single time, then how do you expect the rest of the team to step up and win? And WSEWC, it was not a punk thing to do. You did the punk thing and spoke on issues you're not associated with. You don't know me, kansaswrestler, or anyone from Manhattan at that time, so your information is quite limited, as always. Have a nice day gentleman.

I would also like to say that I agree with Alex. You shouldn't do whole teams in the same association with best wrestlers. The only real way to settle it, is to have top 2 from each classification battle it out. Then on a later date, take the top 4 from each classification and see who's the best. That way you have a 16 man bracket and you will get the wrestlers who placed 3rd maybe because of a bad call on the front side.

Re: state 6a #32913 11/12/05 07:03 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,443
R
RichardDSalyer Offline
Member
Offline
Member
R
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,443
Chris:

As you know, Manhattan High School consists of two campus facilities:

East Campus
901 Poyntz Ave.
Manhattan, KS 66502

and

West Campus
2100 Poyntz Ave.
Manhattan, KS 66502

If the Wichita school district followed the lead of the Manhattan school district and combined the enrollment of their campus facilities to form one, two, three, or four athletic programs, instead of the current seven public school programs, the results likely would be entirely different.

It would be interesting to determine how successful the Manhattan athletic programs would be if each campus facility formed their own athletic programs similar to Andover, Lawrence, and Salina, etc. With the talent pool diluted in all athletic programs to support an East and West high school program, it is much more difficult for either school to compete for a championship in either football or wrestling.

There have been years in the recent past when Wichita South and Wichita West, with their wrestling programs combined, would have seriously challenged for, if not won, the large school championship.

Based on past Manhattan enrollment figures, if the Manhattan school district followed the norm in Kansas and had athletic programs at each campus, with the reduced enrollment figures, the Manhattan schools would compete in the 5A classification and would likely have fared far worse against teams such as Arkansas City, Bishop Carroll and K. C. Turner.

While you are smugly bad mouthing other school district programs, remember Manhattan is competing with two high school campuses combined to increase the number of students with which to populate the team and increase the odds of success.


Richard D. Salyer
Re: state 6a #32914 11/12/05 09:34 PM
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,408
Prant Garker Offline
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,408
Mr. Salyer,

Without entering into this debate, I do believe you are misunderstanding the "East Campus" and "West Campus" issue.

In the mid-90s, USD 383 built two new middle schools to alleviate the over-crowding at Manhattan Middle School. The freshman from MHS were then moved to the East Campus so that all grades would have more space.

Thus, East Campus is an all-freshman school. Freshman are bused up to the West Campus for varsity athletics, and both the East and West campus are considered "Manhattan High School."

Hope this clears things up.

Re: state 6a #32915 11/12/05 11:28 PM
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 588
parkwayred Offline
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 588
I like the concept that Manhattan has two High schools. Manhattan East and Manhattan West. East side/West side. Sounds pretty gangster to me HOMIE!


I’m not very smart… but I can lift heavy things!
Re: state 6a #32916 11/13/05 02:37 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,443
R
RichardDSalyer Offline
Member
Offline
Member
R
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,443
Quote:
Originally posted by Prant Garker:
Mr. Salyer,

Without entering into this debate, I do believe you are misunderstanding the "East Campus" and "West Campus" issue.

In the mid-90s, USD 383 built two new middle schools to alleviate the over-crowding at Manhattan Middle School. The freshman from MHS were then moved to the East Campus so that all grades would have more space.

Thus, East Campus is an all-freshman school. Freshman are bused up to the West Campus for varsity athletics, and both the East and West campus are considered "Manhattan High School."

Hope this clears things up.
Yes it does! Thank you for the clarification as I did have an obvious gross misunderstanding of the two campus issue.


Richard D. Salyer
Re: state 6a #32917 11/15/05 03:02 AM
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 15
B
BAwrestler Offline
Junior Member
Offline
Junior Member
B
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 15
STA might have a good chance in the 5A

Re: state 6a #32918 11/15/05 08:42 PM
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 984
X
XGHSWC Offline
Member
Offline
Member
X
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 984
Come on billy mcjackson, get real. Your comments are absurd man. Give it a rest.
The ratio of quality wrestlers per number of students coming out of Wichita is just as high as any district in the state and higher than most. Remember that those Wichita kids are not at one high school, they are spread out over 12 schools in all 4 classes.
This was a 5A discussion that you turned into a Manhattan vs. Wichita thing. I gave Manhattan their props but that was not good enough for you. You had to hack some more on Wichita. How many DI wrestlers has Manhattan produced, one? Wichita has produced many. And tons from the other divisions.
Additionally, the Wichita district has produced more team state championships than any district in the state and I am not counting Kapaun and Carroll. Be thankful that the district is split up because if you put those high schools (just the public) together, no other school from any district would ever win a title and more than half of the best athletes do not even wrestle because overall, Wichita cares more about basketball than wrestling. Most of the wrestling "powers" in the state do not have that problem.
Why are you still ranting about Carroll and this "hypothetical dual victory" thing. Do you have a Carroll complex. You can say what you want, but Carroll has owned Manhattan over the years. Once again, I gave Manhattan their props but that was not good enough for you. Stats and results talk. How about last year? Manhattan, the 6A runner-up, was what at Newton, 8th?
They placed behind the 3A state champ, the 4A state champ, the 5A state champ (Carroll) and two other 5A teams. I guess they had a bad weekend, right? Or perhaps bad match ups at the tournament? Everybody respects Manhattan but you are not giving them much reason to.
And as far as I go, you are lost. It does not matter whether I know you or anyone from Manhattan, I do know the issues and I am associated with them, it's my profession so my information is far from limited. For you on the other hand, it's a hobby. Also, I do not have to know you to know the issues. You do not know me, but you are an authority on Wichita (in your own mind).

Re: state 6a #32919 11/16/05 03:05 AM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 97
Meven Stiller Offline
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 97
last year we had 4 JV guys in the line up at Newton

Re: state 6a #32920 11/16/05 04:07 AM
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 126
Brettimus Offline
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 126
Quote:
Originally posted by WSEWC:
This was a 5A discussion
Uhm...i'm pretty sure the topic title reads - "state 6a"

Re: state 6a #32921 11/16/05 01:15 PM
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 984
X
XGHSWC Offline
Member
Offline
Member
X
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 984
Yes Brettimus, you are correct. But someone, and it was not me, brought up how tough 5A was going to be especially with the addition of Aquinas and Emporia. Someone then preceeded to slam 5A and that is when I responded and it went from there.

Re: state 6a #32922 11/16/05 08:27 PM
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 8
K
kansaswrestler2_103 Offline
Junior Member
Offline
Junior Member
K
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 8
mike church do ever watch manhattan wrestle? cause it doesnt sound like it

Re: state 6a #32923 11/17/05 03:44 AM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 436
M
Mike Church Sr. Offline
Member
Offline
Member
M
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 436
kansaswrestler2_103, both of your post are very interesting. I know you put alot of thought into both of them. Yes I have watched Manhappyland wrestle. They were very exciting back in the late 90's and with a little work could be that good again. Best of luck to ya.

Re: state 6a #32924 11/17/05 05:10 AM
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,255
A
Aaron Sweazy Offline
Member
Offline
Member
A
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,255
Quote:
Originally posted by Mike Church Sr.:
kansaswrestler2_103, both of your post are very interesting. I know you put alot of thought into both of them. Yes I have watched Manhappyland wrestle. They were very exciting back in the late 90's and with a little work could be that good again. Best of luck to ya.
Manhattan was pretty intimidating from about 145-HWT for a good run of 5-6 years. Chapman wrestled Manhattan and Hays in a double dual a few years in a row. It was always a good laugh to watch Joel Calovich wrestle Scott Coleman.


Yours in wrestling,

The Swayz
swayz.wrestling@gmail.com recruiting help, promoting the sport& more!
Re: state 6a #32925 11/17/05 05:19 AM
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 360
coachtwink Offline
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 360
Quote:
Originally posted by Mike Church Sr.:
kansaswrestler2_103, both of your post are very interesting. I know you put alot of thought into both of them. Yes I have watched Manhappyland wrestle. They were very exciting back in the late 90's and with a little work could be that good again. Best of luck to ya.
Mr. Church,

I hope you are being sarcastic here, but Manhattan has been very good for a much greater time frame than the late 90's. Lets just look at their accomplishments in the last 6 years (99-00 season through 04-05). They won state in 2004, and 2nd the year before and the year after, and if my memory serves me correctly did not finish lower than 3rd any time since 2000. To me that is pretty darn good. I would say they have been exciting, and with hard work and a little luck (which I believe you create for yourself through hard work) could be state champions this year, not just pretty darn good.

Again, I hope you were being sarcastic- but if not I believe the accomplishments of Manhattan's wrestling program speak loud enough.


Any fool can criticize, complain, and condemn- and most do.
Re: state 6a #32926 11/17/05 11:56 AM
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 588
parkwayred Offline
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 588
Thanks Twink... It's obvious that Mr. Church has not followed 6A wresting for sometime. I know that Manhattan is a team that everyone loves to hate. But when you have been as successful with a bunch of no name wrestlers that just speaks for the kids and coaches determination to make do with the with what hand they were dealt. For some reason I recall a coach being named to the Hall of Fame, I wonder where he was from?


I’m not very smart… but I can lift heavy things!
Re: state 6a #32927 11/17/05 01:20 PM
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 236
Bobby Bovaird Offline
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 236
Manhattan wrestling was pretty dominant in 97-98, too, back when they were loaded with state champions: Scott Coleman (96, 97, 98), Matt Bradshaw (runner-up in 96, champ in 97 and 98), AJ Polansky (97, 98), and Damon Parker (97, 98). Not to mention some other good wrestlers who made some runs for the title, such as Kenneth Walter and Josh Pemberton.

Manhattan is a school with a great tradition and some recent successes that very few schools can rival. They've got reason to be confident with their potential for success in the coming years, but the thing is, each year brings a new season. Each year they (like any other team) have to overcome the reality of graduating seniors, injuries, and ineligibility. Their tradition is enough to give them a psychological edge, but it's not like they can carry their team trophies or individual state medals with them onto the mat each time they compete. We'll just have to see what February brings for all of us.


Gifted Teacher
Head Wrestling Coach, Louisburg High School
Director of Coaches Development, USAWKS
Re: state 6a #32928 11/17/05 05:59 PM
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 8
K
kansaswrestler2_103 Offline
Junior Member
Offline
Junior Member
K
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 8
church i put lots of thought into what i say i mean ive been around manhattna wrestling long enough to know that where better than ur making us out to be so if u wanna talk u better back up ur statement with facts of why manhattan "sucks" besides that we beat whatever team ur cheering for

Re: state 6a #32929 11/17/05 07:23 PM
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 999
Chase Offline
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 999
Hey Church's...I just figured out that I'm sitting next to your sister and step-daughter right now...Jenifer Lekawa....small world..


Hey Butt-Head what did people do before they invented TV?
Don't be stupid Beavis there's always been TV, there's just more channels now.
Oh yeah, heh heh hehe... progress is cool. Heh hehe heh
Re: state 6a #32930 11/17/05 11:51 PM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 436
M
Mike Church Sr. Offline
Member
Offline
Member
M
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 436
Chase, It must be tough. I hope your in school making that statement!! Hey Goddard looks good this year!! Best of luck to you guys. Tell Tyler Caldwell hello for me.

Re: state 6a #32931 11/18/05 12:06 AM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 436
M
Mike Church Sr. Offline
Member
Offline
Member
M
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 436
kansaswrestler2_103, Good luck to ya buddy!! Just don't let the Manhattanites like Prant see your spelling/grammar. He says I spell like an 8th grader, that would put you on about the third grade level. I hope Manhattan wrestling doesn't go the same direction as Manhattan football I'd have to sell my purple crap to the hippies on the south side. Ohh Scott Coleman and Matt Bradshaw were two of my favorite wrestlers to watch back in the mid to later 90's its just not that exciting there to me anymore but don't take it personal thats just me!! Also little man you won't find a post where I ever said anyone sucks thats you talkin. Right now I think Hoxie and Norton carry the big stick!!

Page 3 of 5 1 2 3 4 5

Moderated by  Nate Naasz, RedStorm 

Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 179 guests, and 3 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
CorbinPickerill, ptv, Dane Edwards, Mikemacias, tcox
12298 Registered Users
Forum Statistics
Forums10
Topics35,941
Posts250,373
Members12,298
Most Online709
Nov 21st, 2011
Top Posters(All Time)
usawks1 8,595
smokeycabin 6,248
Aaron Sweazy 5,255
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.2
(Release build 20190702)
PHP: 7.2.34 Page Time: 0.022s Queries: 14 (0.005s) Memory: 0.8549 MB (Peak: 1.1088 MB) Data Comp: Off Server Time: 2024-05-09 03:57:26 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS