What if I add Marlatt to the list? Where would you put Bush then? We've been here before.
Bush beat Delp 8-5. Delp pinned Marlatt. Marlatt pinned Bush.
All in the same tournament. Mason has criteria too.
Ok and Bush has a win over Marlatt, so of these 4 Bush is the only one with a win over all 3 others. according to your rankings we are suppose to believe that Delp is a better wrestler than Bush even tho he has never beaten him. Regardless of who else you throw in, head to head Bush 2 Delp 0, and by the way I believe Marlatt should be on there before the other 3. I am just trying to understand, you preach all the time "CRITERIA CRITERIA" and I just don't get how head to head, 0-2 beats out 2-0
