Re: 4A split proposal passed, but not for wrestling
[Re: John Johnson]
#219756
06/19/13 03:36 AM
|
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 4,326
Cokeley
Member
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 4,326 |
Will, anytime you use a product or service provided by the private or public sectors that have employees who used the public education system, you are benefiting from it. But, yes, you have some good points, and again, another thread hi-jacked!!!
On the topic, I think it is a sad commentary on today's youth that posters imply that the only way to build a program is to make it easier for the wrestlers to succeed, and we are not talking about them, the wrestles, working hard.
Also, a lot of kids have worked real hard to get 5/6th in their respective state tourneys. Adding another class would truly cheapen their accomplishments. Anytime you send your kid(s) to a private school the public school benefits as they still receive your funding but you do not use the FULL SERVICES you would be entitled to. KSHSAA is becoming a joke. 8 state champs in football. Wow. Two in 8 man?? How can their be that much disparity between the smallest and largest 8 man school?? The whole thing is so watered down and many are still missing the point that the school count for each classification is not just based on the number of schools but on total enrollment. 2012 KSHSAA Enrollments 6A 53383 32 Schools 5A 31232 32 Schools 4A 28657 64 Schools 321 28133 227 Schools
Will Cokeley (708)267-6615 willcokeley@gmail.com
|
|
|
Entire Thread
|
4A split proposal passed, but not for wrestling
|
Kit Harris
|
06/04/13 07:55 PM
|
Re: 4A split proposal passed, but not for wrestling
|
Kit Harris
|
06/04/13 07:56 PM
|
Re: 4A split proposal passed, but not for wrestling
|
Bronco Wrestler
|
06/05/13 09:40 PM
|
Re: 4A split proposal passed, but not for wrestling
|
Cokeley
|
06/05/13 11:10 PM
|
Re: 4A split proposal passed, but not for wrestling
|
sportsfan02
|
06/06/13 01:38 AM
|
Re: 4A split proposal passed, but not for wrestling
|
Peanut1234
|
06/06/13 02:04 PM
|
Re: 4A split proposal passed, but not for wrestling
|
L.Geyer
|
06/06/13 02:58 PM
|
Re: 4A split proposal passed, but not for wrestling
|
Beeson
|
06/07/13 01:30 AM
|
Re: 4A split proposal passed, but not for wrestling
|
Doug Vander Linden
|
06/07/13 07:03 PM
|
Re: 4A split proposal passed, but not for wrestling
|
Kit Harris
|
06/07/13 08:42 PM
|
Re: 4A split proposal passed, but not for wrestling
|
Mitchell
|
06/08/13 01:13 AM
|
Re: 4A split proposal passed, but not for wrestling
|
objective
|
06/08/13 02:38 AM
|
Re: 4A split proposal passed, but not for wrestling
|
Mitchell
|
06/08/13 01:15 PM
|
Re: 4A split proposal passed, but not for wrestling
|
Beeson
|
06/08/13 07:14 PM
|
Re: 4A split proposal passed, but not for wrestling
|
RedStorm
|
06/08/13 09:08 PM
|
Re: 4A split proposal passed, but not for wrestling
|
M.Church_AD
|
06/10/13 08:35 PM
|
Re: 4A split proposal passed, but not for wrestling
|
XGHSWC
|
06/13/13 12:10 PM
|
Re: 4A split proposal passed, but not for wrestling
|
XGHSWC
|
06/13/13 01:14 PM
|
Re: 4A split proposal passed, but not for wrestling
|
objective
|
06/13/13 01:49 AM
|
Re: 4A split proposal passed, but not for wrestling
|
objective
|
06/13/13 09:37 PM
|
Re: 4A split proposal passed, but not for wrestling
|
ksuwrestling2
|
06/13/13 10:03 PM
|
Re: 4A split proposal passed, but not for wrestling
|
Kit Harris
|
06/13/13 10:15 PM
|
Re: 4A split proposal passed, but not for wrestling
|
Doug Vander Linden
|
06/15/13 05:39 PM
|
Re: 4A split proposal passed, but not for wrestling
|
Kit Harris
|
06/15/13 06:44 PM
|
Re: 4A split proposal passed, but not for wrestling
|
Doug Vander Linden
|
06/15/13 10:07 PM
|
Re: 4A split proposal passed, but not for wrestling
|
Mitchell
|
06/15/13 10:29 PM
|
Re: 4A split proposal passed, but not for wrestling
|
Kit Harris
|
06/15/13 11:57 PM
|
Re: 4A split proposal passed, but not for wrestling
|
M.Church_AD
|
06/17/13 02:56 AM
|
Re: 4A split proposal passed, but not for wrestling
|
Cokeley
|
06/18/13 12:20 PM
|
Re: 4A split proposal passed, but not for wrestling
|
Flagrant
|
06/18/13 07:13 PM
|
Re: 4A split proposal passed, but not for wrestling
|
Cokeley
|
06/18/13 10:46 PM
|
Re: 4A split proposal passed, but not for wrestling
|
John Johnson
|
06/19/13 01:07 AM
|
Re: 4A split proposal passed, but not for wrestling
|
ksuwrestling2
|
06/19/13 01:50 AM
|
Re: 4A split proposal passed, but not for wrestling
|
RedStorm
|
06/19/13 02:52 AM
|
Re: 4A split proposal passed, but not for wrestling
|
sportsfan02
|
06/19/13 03:45 AM
|
Re: 4A split proposal passed, but not for wrestling
|
Cokeley
|
06/19/13 01:34 PM
|
Re: 4A split proposal passed, but not for wrestling
|
ksuwrestling2
|
06/19/13 01:57 PM
|
Re: 4A split proposal passed, but not for wrestling
|
Kit Harris
|
06/19/13 03:37 PM
|
Re: 4A split proposal passed, but not for wrestling
|
Chief Renegade
|
06/19/13 06:38 PM
|
Re: 4A split proposal passed, but not for wrestling
|
Hull DWC
|
06/19/13 10:01 PM
|
Re: 4A split proposal passed, but not for wrestling
|
Troy Keiswetter
|
06/20/13 01:00 AM
|
Re: 4A split proposal passed, but not for wrestling
|
Cokeley
|
06/19/13 05:13 PM
|
Re: 4A split proposal passed, but not for wrestling
|
Doug Vander Linden
|
06/19/13 06:28 PM
|
Re: 4A split proposal passed, but not for wrestling
|
Beeson
|
06/20/13 10:15 AM
|
Re: 4A split proposal passed, but not for wrestling
|
Chief Renegade
|
06/20/13 11:39 AM
|
Re: 4A split proposal passed, but not for wrestling
|
ksuwrestling2
|
06/20/13 01:34 PM
|
Re: 4A split proposal passed, but not for wrestling
|
XGHSWC
|
06/20/13 02:32 PM
|
Re: 4A split proposal passed, but not for wrestling
|
Chief Renegade
|
06/20/13 03:43 PM
|
Re: 4A split proposal passed, but not for wrestling
|
ksuwrestling2
|
06/20/13 04:47 PM
|
Re: 4A split proposal passed, but not for wrestling
|
Chief Renegade
|
06/20/13 04:59 PM
|
Re: 4A split proposal passed, but not for wrestling
|
RedStorm
|
06/20/13 06:15 PM
|
Re: 4A split proposal passed, but not for wrestling
|
Cokeley
|
06/21/13 10:38 AM
|
Re: 4A split proposal passed, but not for wrestling
|
Cokeley
|
06/24/13 03:32 AM
|
Re: 4A split proposal passed, but not for wrestling
|
Kit Harris
|
06/24/13 11:58 AM
|
Re: 4A split proposal passed, but not for wrestling
|
Cokeley
|
06/24/13 12:21 PM
|
Re: 4A split proposal passed, but not for wrestling
|
RedStorm
|
06/24/13 04:22 PM
|
Re: 4A split proposal passed, but not for wrestling
|
Cokeley
|
06/25/13 02:30 AM
|
Re: 4A split proposal passed, but not for wrestling
|
Beeson
|
06/25/13 03:46 PM
|
Re: 4A split proposal passed, but not for wrestling
|
Teamroper
|
06/25/13 04:29 PM
|
Re: 4A split proposal passed, but not for wrestling
|
M.Church_AD
|
06/26/13 07:48 PM
|
Re: 4A split proposal passed, but not for wrestling
|
Beeson
|
06/26/13 08:31 PM
|
Re: 4A split proposal passed, but not for wrestling
|
M.Church_AD
|
07/01/13 03:55 PM
|
Re: 4A split proposal passed, but not for wrestling
|
shawnbudke
|
06/24/13 12:02 PM
|
Re: 4A split proposal passed, but not for wrestling
|
M.Church_AD
|
06/20/13 08:13 PM
|
Re: 4A split proposal passed, but not for wrestling
|
Teamroper
|
06/20/13 08:59 PM
|
Re: 4A split proposal passed, but not for wrestling
|
ksuwrestling2
|
06/20/13 09:48 PM
|
Re: 4A split proposal passed, but not for wrestling
|
Chief Renegade
|
06/21/13 02:45 AM
|
Re: 4A split proposal passed, but not for wrestling
|
Cokeley
|
06/19/13 03:36 AM
|
Re: 4A split proposal passed, but not for wrestling
|
Cokeley
|
06/16/13 03:05 AM
|
Re: 4A split proposal passed, but not for wrestling
|
Enetophobic
|
06/16/13 03:44 AM
|
Re: 4A split proposal passed, but not for wrestling
|
ksuwrestling2
|
06/16/13 04:20 AM
|
Re: 4A split proposal passed, but not for wrestling
|
Cokeley
|
06/20/13 03:47 AM
|
|
|
0 registered members (),
100
guests, and 3
spiders. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums10
Topics35,949
Posts250,384
Members12,302
|
Most Online709 Nov 21st, 2011
|
|
|